Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

TORM LOTTE

IMO
9392468
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
28,947 t
Port of registry
Copenhagen
Technical efficiency
EEXI 4.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA Super

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TORM A/S · part of TORM

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 28,947 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
97.3 kg/nm
Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+22%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
10.54
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (−30%)
Average speed
11.4 kn
Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (+3%)
Fuel per day at sea
26.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
3,147 t
CO₂ emitted
9,869 t
10,023 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
32,347 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,836 h
118 days, 32% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 97.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+22%)
52.8Ranks 1,126 of 1,460, lowest first111.0
Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 11.1 (+3%)
8.8Faster than 59% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (−30%)
7.93Ranks 384 of 1,460, lowest first40.17
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports23%
  • From the EU41%
  • Into the EU31%
  • At berth in the EU5%

64% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,333 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
5.1%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.2 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.016
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • TORM LOTTE
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • TORM LOTTE
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • TORM LOTTE
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−1.8 kn+7%−7%+283%+50%1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+1.3 kn−17%−7%+7%−33%1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+1.1 kn+9%+20%−78%−7%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−0.6 kn+1%−4%+24%+11%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021+0.9 kn+15%+25%−19%−4%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019+0.2 kn−14%−12%+24%−16%Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025TORM A/S3,1479,86932,3472,83611.497.310.54–
2024TORM A/S7662,3878,43864113.290.87.01–
2023not published8552,6737,85266211.9108.910.53–
2022not published3,55911,13335,7623,29810.899.511.33–
2021not published2,8448,88528,9272,53811.498.310.23–
2019not published3,0519,55635,7513,41110.585.310.63–
2018not published2,8509,05728,8672,81210.398.712.62–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025TORM A/S10.5415.04−30%384 of 1,460DNVB+C
2024TORM A/S7.018.06−13%684 of 1,787DNVB+C
2023not published10.538.44+25%1,172 of 1,797DNVB+C
2022not published11.338.51+33%1,333 of 1,961DNVB+C
2021not published10.238.86+15%1,068 of 1,789DNVB+C
2019not published10.638.83+20%1,236 of 1,919Lloyd's Register–
2018not published12.628.86+42%1,272 of 1,779Lloyd's Register–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.