Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

AQUAMARINE ACE

IMO: 9397987
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,729 t
Flag (estimated): Panama (from the 2023 report)
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.80 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,163 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

84.7

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (−19%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

63.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 59.0 (+8%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.2 kn (−6%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,388 t

CO₂ emitted

7,489 t

Distance sailed

28,217 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,115 h

88 days, 24% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 113 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+13%)

79.6Ranks 422 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 14.4 (+6%)

12.0Faster than 75% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 52.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (−5%)

34.7Ranks 228 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports43%
From the EU43%
Into the EU10%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

252 t

3.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AQUAMARINE ACE
Vehicle carrier median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

AQUAMARINE ACE
Vehicle carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AQUAMARINE ACE
Vehicle carrier median

45.050.055.060.065.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2025	−0.6 kn	+10%	+6%	+189%	+11%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	+8%	−1%	−43%	−1%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.5 kn	+1%	+17%	−19%	−6%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+2.7 kn	+24%	+54%	−7%	+5%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 24%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.2 kn	−10%	−19%	−20%	−24%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	−1%	−15%	+42%	+4%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	172	549	1,432	232	6.2	120	101	–
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	3,155	9,876	27,882	1,826	15.3	113	52.6	89%
2023	not published	991	3,128	9,659	606	15.9	103	47.5	–
2022	not published	1,617	5,096	16,967	979	17.3	95.3	47.9	–
2021	not published	1,983	6,275	20,915	1,409	14.8	94.8	50.8	–
2020	not published	1,714	5,401	22,506	1,866	12.1	76.2	48.3	–
2019	not published	2,388	7,489	28,217	2,115	13.3	84.7	63.8	–
2018	not published	1,696	5,315	19,822	1,280	15.5	85.6	61.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	A+B+C
2025	MOL GLOBAL SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.	52.6	55.4	−5%	228 of 506	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	47.5	56.6	−16%	116 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	47.9	57.7	−17%	134 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	50.8	59.6	−15%	144 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	48.3	57.3	−16%	132 of 449	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	63.8	59.0	+8%	251 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	61.3	62.4	−2%	209 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.