Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM TITAN

IMO: 9399222
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 59,078 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.97 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 114,432 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

309

Container median 174 kg/nm (+77%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.42

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−55%)

Average speed

16.6 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+21%)

Fuel per day at sea

122.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

14,185 t

CO₂ emitted

44,227 t

Distance sailed

45,901 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,770 h

115 days, 32% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 184 kg/nm · median 177 (+4%)

78.8Ranks 1,161 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.6 kn · median 13.3 (−13%)

9.1Faster than 27% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.96 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−39%)

7.22Ranks 567 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports23%
From the EU1%
Into the EU72%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

13,674 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,614 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM TITAN
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM TITAN
Container median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM TITAN
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−3.4 kn	−32%	−47%	−96%	+25%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 32%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	+11%	+23%	+89%	+4%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−1.2 kn	−4%	−12%	+267%	−48%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−23%	−24%	−69%	+59%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 23%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−1.4 kn	+5%	−3%	−35%	+10%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	+6%	+9%	+27%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	523	1,676	2,848	245	11.6	184	9.96	89%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	17,388	54,359	64,376	4,306	15.0	270	7.94	98%
2023	not published	8,263	25,870	34,049	2,512	13.6	243	7.66	96%
2021	not published	2,335	7,373	9,270	624	14.8	252	14.7	98%
2020	not published	9,740	30,705	29,891	1,970	15.2	326	9.27	100%
2019	not published	14,185	44,227	45,901	2,770	16.6	309	8.42	96%
2018	not published	10,509	32,749	36,198	2,241	16.2	290	8.65	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	9.96	16.3	−39%	567 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	7.94	17.5	−55%	261 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	7.66	19.4	−61%	218 of 1,899	ABS	C
2021	not published	14.7	17.9	−18%	696 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	9.27	17.6	−47%	325 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	8.42	18.9	−55%	222 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	8.65	20.2	−57%	172 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.