Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- CMA SHIPS SASyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| CMA SHIPS SAS | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 60 |
| CO₂ emitted | 2.1 Mt−23.1% |
| Fuel per mile | 256 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 14.4 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 3.8% |
| Ships burning LNG | 21 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- CMA SHIPS SAS8.9 (−45% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA SHIPS SAS | 59 | 8.9 | −45% | 260 | 14.5 | 3,395 | 3.8% | 21 |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Con-ro
CO₂ per transport work (volume) in g CO₂/m³·nm · segment median 9.9
- CMA SHIPS SAS16.3 (+65% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA SHIPS SAS | 1 | 16.3 | +65% | 45 | 11.9 | 4,837 | 4.2% | – |
| Segment median | 9.9 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMA SHIPS SAS | ABS (58), EnvService (2) | 0% | 0% | 98% | 0% |
CMA SHIPS SAS: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AKNOUL | 8917883 | Con-ro | 16.3 g CO₂/m³·nm | 9.9 | +65% | 11.9 | 8,246 t | €237k |
| CMA CGM SINNAMARY | 9845673 | Container | 32.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +48% | 13.8 | 28,884 t | €864k |
| CMA CGM KOUROU | 9845659 | Container | 32.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +46% | 13.9 | 24,369 t | €724k |
| CMA CGM BENJAMIN FRANKLIN | 9706891 | Container | 10.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +42% | 15.7 | 71,315 t | €2.1m |
| CMA CGM CAYENNE | 9709192 | Container | 30.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +39% | 12.8 | 20,591 t | €651k |
| CMA CGM ZHENG HE | 9706906 | Container | 9.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +39% | 14.8 | 29,557 t | €881k |
| CMA CGM MARSEILLE | 9709207 | Container | 30.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +37% | 12.4 | 26,347 t | €793k |
| CMA CGM TAGE | 9674555 | Container | 14.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +37% | 12.0 | 12,432 t | €214k |
| CMA CGM SAINT LAURENT | 9709219 | Container | 30.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +36% | 14.0 | 29,023 t | €852k |
| CMA CGM KERGUELEN | 9702132 | Container | 9.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +32% | 15.8 | 42,090 t | €1.3m |
| CMA CGM VASCO DE GAMA | 9706889 | Container | 9.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +31% | 15.5 | 57,368 t | €1.7m |
| CMA CGM RODOLPHE | 9729075 | Container | 12.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +23% | 16.6 | 27,975 t | €741k |
| CMA CGM GEORG FORSTER | 9702144 | Container | 8.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +17% | 15.4 | 58,253 t | €1.6m |
| CMA CGM LOIRE | 9674531 | Container | 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +15% | 13.7 | 23,201 t | €403k |
| CMA CGM COLUMBA | 9410789 | Container | 8.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +14% | 12.0 | 31,290 t | €1.0m |
| CMA CGM CARL ANTOINE | 9729087 | Container | 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 10.3 | +14% | 14.2 | 40,691 t | €1.1m |
| CMA CGM LISA MARIE | 9729099 | Container | 16.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +14% | 14.2 | 4,698 t | €139k |
| CMA CGM NADOR | 9396696 | Container | 49.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +10% | 7.2 | 5,335 t | €192k |
| CMA CGM EVERGLADELNG | 9894985 | Container | 7.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +10% | 15.4 | 18,830 t | €532k |
| CMA CGM LOUIS BLERIOT | 9776432 | Container | 7.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | +8% | 15.4 | 83,936 t | €2.4m |
| CMA CGM DAKHLA | 9461594 | Container | 46.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 44.8 | +5% | 5.6 | 2,069 t | €57k |
| CMA CGM JEAN GABRIEL | 9729128 | Container | 15.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | +4% | 11.3 | 4,732 t | €155k |
| CMA CGM SAHARA | 9220861 | Container | 22.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +2% | 8.6 | 13,477 t | €558k |
| CMA CGM JEAN MERMOZ | 9776420 | Container | 7.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | 0% | 16.1 | 66,747 t | €1.9m |
| CMA CGM CALLISTO | 9410753 | Container | 14.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 14.4 | 0% | 14.2 | 4,437 t | €132k |
| CMA CGM CEDRUSLNG | 9938121 | Container | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −3% | 15.3 | 16,872 t | €490k |
| CMA CGM ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY | 9776418 | Container | 6.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −4% | 14.9 | 72,718 t | €2.1m |
| CMA CGM GREENLANDLNG | 9895006 | Container | 6.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −4% | 15.9 | 55,096 t | €1.4m |
| CMA CGM CHAMPS ELYSEESLNG | 9839131 | Container | 6.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −9% | 15.5 | 77,250 t | €2.2m |
| CMA CGM LOUVRELNG | 9839143 | Container | 6.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 7.1 | −9% | 16.3 | 74,753 t | €2.1m |
30 of 60 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.