Navalyze · Container · Ship

SONGA PUMA

IMO: 9399789
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 18,191 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEDI 17.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CAP ROCA, ALGARROBO, ROBIN 1

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Songa Shipmanagement Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,638 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

151

Container median 178 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+40%)

Average speed

15.2 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+12%)

Fuel per day at sea

55.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,969 t

CO₂ emitted

40,549 t

Distance sailed

85,686 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,631 h

235 days, 64% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 145 kg/nm · median 177 (−18%)

78.8Ranks 888 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.6 kn · median 13.3 (+10%)

9.1Faster than 70% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 25.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+54%)

7.22Ranks 1,559 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports1%
From the EU48%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU0%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

191 t

0.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SONGA PUMA
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0250.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SONGA PUMA
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SONGA PUMA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−1%	+1%	−37%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−8%	−11%	−29%	−14%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.5 kn	+5%	+1%	−18%	+12%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+3.8 kn	+13%	+52%	+421%	−55%	3.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−10.9 kn	+58%	−19%	−12%	+166%	10.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 58%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+8.9 kn	−41%	−2%	+117%	−46%	8.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 41%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.5 kn	−33%	−47%	−61%	+39%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 33%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	4,549	14,259	31,279	2,149	14.6	145	25.1	–
2024	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	7,302	23,015	49,861	3,497	14.3	146	25.8	–
2023	not published	11,206	35,094	70,311	4,797	14.7	159	30.0	–
2022	not published	12,969	40,549	85,686	5,631	15.2	151	26.8	–
2021	not published	2,193	6,895	16,432	1,443	11.4	133	60.2	–
2020	not published	1,580	4,998	18,707	840	22.3	84.4	22.7	–
2019	not published	1,226	3,841	8,604	640	13.4	143	41.8	–
2018	not published	4,717	14,749	22,227	1,316	16.9	212	30.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	25.1	16.3	+54%	1,559 of 2,208	Korean Register	B
2024	Songa Shipmanagement Ltd	25.8	17.5	+47%	1,352 of 1,974	Korean Register	C
2023	not published	30.0	19.4	+55%	1,346 of 1,899	Korean Register	C
2022	not published	26.8	19.1	+40%	1,210 of 1,825	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	60.2	17.9	+236%	1,678 of 1,781	Korean Register	A
2020	not published	22.7	17.6	+29%	1,132 of 1,797	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	41.8	18.9	+122%	1,454 of 1,788	ABS	B
2018	not published	30.0	20.2	+49%	1,171 of 1,705	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.