Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2025
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Songa Shipmanagement Ltdyour view
Side by side
All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 18 |
| CO₂ emitted | 208 kt−13.4% |
| Fuel per mile | 101 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 10.4 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 12.1% |
| Ships burning LNG | 0 |
| Main segment | Chemical tanker |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Chemical tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 15.0
- Songa Shipmanagement Ltd37.8 (+151% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | 9 | 37.8 | +151% | 93 | 9.5 | 3,457 | 17.5% | – |
| Segment median | 15.0 | 0% |
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3
- Songa Shipmanagement Ltd23.6 (+45% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | 5 | 23.6 | +45% | 108 | 12.9 | 3,652 | 4.4% | – |
| Segment median | 16.3 | 0% |
Oil tanker
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 8.0
- Songa Shipmanagement Ltd39.2 (+394% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | 4 | 39.2 | +394% | 105 | 9.0 | 3,395 | 15.8% | – |
| Segment median | 8.0 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Songa Shipmanagement Ltd | Korean Register (18) | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% |
Songa Shipmanagement Ltd: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONGA ATLANTIC | 9447328 | Chemical tanker | 45.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +111% | 9.2 | 4,579 t | €227k |
| SONGA TAURUS | 9373644 | Chemical tanker | 37.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +77% | 10.2 | 8,272 t | €344k |
| SONGA OPAL | 9473913 | Oil tanker | 43.2 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +59% | 8.2 | 9,094 t | €335k |
| SONGA RUBY | 9444479 | Chemical tanker | 32.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +53% | 10.2 | 10,582 t | €516k |
| SONGA SAPPHIRE | 9444467 | Oil tanker | 40.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +49% | 8.3 | 10,194 t | €396k |
| SONGA PEARL | 9444455 | Oil tanker | 38.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +40% | 10.2 | 10,583 t | €493k |
| SONGA FALCON | 9396012 | Chemical tanker | 28.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +33% | 9.0 | 10,941 t | €522k |
| SONGA WOLF | 9373498 | Container | 28.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +29% | 10.8 | 9,049 t | €272k |
| SONGA POLARIS | 9457749 | Chemical tanker | 27.0 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +26% | 10.2 | 10,694 t | €510k |
| SONGA COSMOS | 9457024 | Oil tanker | 34.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 27.1 | +26% | 9.4 | 10,331 t | €481k |
| SONGA EAGLE | 9388704 | Chemical tanker | 24.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 21.4 | +15% | 8.5 | 12,220 t | €535k |
| SONGA PUMA | 9399789 | Container | 25.1 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +13% | 14.6 | 14,259 t | €382k |
| SONGA AURORA | 9373632 | Chemical tanker | 42.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +9% | 9.5 | 9,835 t | €452k |
| SANTA MARTA EXPRESS | 9446104 | Container | 23.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | +6% | 13.8 | 24,332 t | €719k |
| SONGA JADE | 9473925 | Chemical tanker | 40.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | +4% | 9.3 | 11,481 t | €513k |
| PUERTO LIMON EXPRESS | 9434943 | Container | 21.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −1% | 13.3 | 20,527 t | €694k |
| SONGA ORION | 9831024 | Chemical tanker | 38.5 g CO₂/t·nm | 39.2 | −2% | 9.7 | 8,392 t | €321k |
| SONGA PANTHER | 9947732 | Container | 16.7 g CO₂/t·nm | 22.2 | −25% | 12.3 | 12,324 t | €630k |
30 of 18 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.