Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

FORT DESAIX

IMO
9400174
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
28,469 t
Flag (estimated)
Malta
Port of registry
Valletta
Technical efficiency
EEXI 13.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
JPO TAURUS, CMA CGM FORT DESAIX

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION · part of Conbulk

?
?

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 24,578 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
261
Container median 186 kg/nm (+41%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
33.3
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+86%)
Average speed
24.7 kn
Container median 14.1 kn (+75%)
Fuel per day at sea
154.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
22,365 t
CO₂ emitted
70,050 t
Distance sailed
85,563 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,467 h
144 days, 40% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 139 kg/nm · median 177 (−22%)
78.8Ranks 839 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.3 (+2%)
9.1Faster than 54% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−7%)
7.22Ranks 1,029 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports70%
  • From the EU9%
  • Into the EU19%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,233 t
1.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • FORT DESAIX
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • FORT DESAIX
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • FORT DESAIX
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2022→2025−8.5 kn−39%−63%+4%−50%8.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 39%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−2.6 kn−13%−22%−43%−9%2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−2.0 kn+29%+19%+59%+24%2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 29%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020–––––

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION7,01021,83050,4803,71213.613915.299%
2022not published11,10434,79248,6142,20222.122830.5–
2021not published22,36570,05085,5633,46724.726133.3–
2020not published10,92034,47353,8292,01826.720326.9–
2018not published00–0––––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION15.216.3−7%1,029 of 2,208ABSA
2022not published30.519.1+59%1,309 of 1,825Bureau VeritasA
2021not published33.317.9+86%1,371 of 1,781Bureau VeritasA
2020not published26.917.6+53%1,274 of 1,797Bureau VeritasA
2018not published––––Verifavia–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.