Navalyze · Market view · Compare

Compare operators, 2025

Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.

CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATIONyour view

Side by side

All 2025 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2024 where the operator reported then.

	CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Ships	17
CO₂ emitted	193 kt−33.2%
Fuel per mile	134 kg/nm
Average speed	11.8 kn
CO₂ at berth	3.6%
Ships burning LNG	0
Main segment	Container

Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.

Segment by segment

Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.

Container

CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 16.3

CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION28.0 (+72% vs median)
← bettersegment medianworse →

	Ships	Per work	vs median	Fuel kg/nm	Speed kn	Hours at sea	At berth	LNG
CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION	17	28.0	+72%	134	11.8	2,512	3.6%	–
Segment median		16.3	0%

Verification and monitoring

Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).

	Verifiers (ships)	A · delivery notes	B · tank monitoring	C · flow meters	D · direct
CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION	ABS (17)	100%	0%	0%	0%

CONBULK SHIPMANAGEMENT CORPORATION: ships furthest from their peers

Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.

Ship	IMO	Segment	CO₂ per transport work	Size-band median	vs median	Speed kn	CO₂	Allowances
SC MONTREUX	9295414	Container	47.3 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	+113%	13.7	1,768 t	€47k
MAYFIELD	9216353	Container	65.1 g CO₂/t·nm	44.8	+45%	11.2	9,651 t	€272k
PORTSMOUTH	9302437	Container	29.1 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	+31%	11.3	1,966 t	€53k
LASALLE	9349368	Container	28.0 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	+26%	8.9	12,661 t	€337k
OOCL ST. LAWRENCE	9290414	Container	27.9 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	+26%	12.6	20,568 t	€638k
MORAGA	9220067	Container	49.8 g CO₂/t·nm	44.8	+11%	8.6	7,972 t	€280k
ALGECIRAS EXPRESS	9227015	Container	21.5 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	−3%	12.2	16,334 t	€436k
ADAMS	9260914	Container	13.9 g CO₂/t·nm	14.4	−3%	15.6	31,015 t	€886k
HUTTON	9311787	Container	21.1 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	−5%	10.6	10,539 t	€441k
SC MEDFORD	9275103	Container	40.5 g CO₂/t·nm	44.8	−10%	11.2	10,747 t	€422k
SC HOUSTON	9445904	Container	18.9 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	−15%	11.5	18,606 t	€567k
SC MONTREAL	9311830	Container	16.7 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	−25%	15.3	4,685 t	€125k
GARDINER	9275048	Container	32.7 g CO₂/t·nm	44.8	−27%	12.6	5,657 t	€150k
FORT DESAIX	9400174	Container	15.2 g CO₂/t·nm	22.2	−31%	13.6	21,830 t	€598k

30 of 17 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.

Notes

Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2025 report it verified.