Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK BATUR

IMO: 9402029
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 27,624 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.20 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 23,901 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

151

Container median 172 kg/nm (−12%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+12%)

Average speed

16.2 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

58.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,636 t

CO₂ emitted

33,265 t

Distance sailed

70,398 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,358 h

182 days, 50% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 128 kg/nm · median 177 (−28%)

78.8Ranks 764 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.0 kn · median 13.3 (+5%)

9.1Faster than 61% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−12%)

7.22Ranks 967 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU47%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

10,636 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

635 t

1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MAERSK BATUR
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MAERSK BATUR
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MAERSK BATUR
Container median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−7%	−15%	+27%	−15%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	+17%	+21%	−25%	+0%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−19%	−20%	−13%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−2.5 kn	−1%	−16%	+60%	+9%	2.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−2%	+5%	−37%	−13%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.4 kn	+9%	+19%	+91%	+7%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+1.0 kn	+1%	+9%	−27%	−3%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	7,458	23,184	58,324	4,157	14.0	128	14.4	98%
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	6,338	19,631	45,943	3,010	15.3	138	16.9	98%
2023	not published	7,240	22,671	61,315	4,152	14.8	118	16.8	98%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	10,335	29,766	70,738	4,759	14.9	146	18.8	98%
2021	not published	6,513	20,411	44,097	2,533	17.4	148	17.3	–
2020	not published	10,636	33,265	70,398	4,358	16.2	151	19.8	100%
2019	not published	5,127	15,998	36,939	2,498	14.8	139	18.4	100%
2018	not published	6,980	21,752	50,940	3,696	13.8	137	19.1	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	14.4	16.3	−12%	967 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	16.9	17.5	−4%	944 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	16.8	19.4	−14%	818 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	18.8	19.1	−2%	894 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	17.3	17.9	−4%	853 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	19.8	17.6	+12%	1,014 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	18.4	18.9	−2%	865 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	19.1	20.2	−6%	788 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.