Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

FURE SPEAR

IMO: 9409273
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 8,291 t
Port of registry: NÓLsoy
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.97 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: LIV KNUTSEN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Furetank Rederi AB

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,291 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

77.5 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−40%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

29.98

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+277%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,598 t

CO₂ emitted

8,328 t

8,456 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

33,505 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,535 h

147 days, 40% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 77.5 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−40%)

76.1Ranks 186 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 9.5 kn · median 10.7 (−11%)

8.0Faster than 23% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.98 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+277%)

4.51Ranks 1,517 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports64%
From the EU8%
Into the EU8%
At berth in the EU20%

92% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (7,655 t).

Fuel burned laden

48%

52% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

19.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FURE SPEAR
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

FURE SPEAR
Oil tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FURE SPEAR
Oil tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	−12%	−15%	+32%	−21%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	−9%	−19%	−26%	−12%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.2 kn	+4%	+6%	−1%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−1%	+6%	+5%	−13%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−4%	+0%	−0%	−12%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.8 kn	−14%	+71%	+33%	−1%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	−0%	−3%	−7%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Furetank Rederi AB	2,598	8,328	33,505	3,535	9.5	77.5	29.98	48%
2024part-year	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	1,478	4,737	14,453	1,455	9.9	102.2	45.19	–
2024	Furetank Rederi AB	2,240	7,180	25,450	2,585	9.8	88.0	37.80	–
2023	not published	3,321	10,647	34,192	3,108	11.0	97.1	42.86	–
2022	not published	3,235	10,358	34,604	3,219	10.8	93.5	37.92	–
2021	not published	3,124	10,010	33,078	3,288	10.1	94.4	43.59	–
2020	not published	3,240	10,384	33,106	3,412	9.7	97.9	49.43	–
2019	not published	2,842	9,105	24,980	5,112	4.9	113.8	50.13	–
2018	not published	3,050	9,737	26,734	5,338	5.0	114.1	50.68	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Furetank Rederi AB	29.98	7.95	+277%	1,517 of 1,665	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2024part-year	Knutsen OAS Shipping AS	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	B
2024	Furetank Rederi AB	37.80	8.06	+369%	1,703 of 1,787	Bureau Veritas	B+C
2023	not published	42.86	8.44	+408%	1,727 of 1,797	Lloyd's Register	B
2022	not published	37.92	8.51	+346%	1,871 of 1,961	Lloyd's Register	B
2021	not published	43.59	8.86	+392%	1,712 of 1,789	Lloyd's Register	B
2020	not published	49.43	9.03	+447%	1,814 of 1,870	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	50.13	8.83	+468%	1,860 of 1,919	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	50.68	8.86	+472%	1,724 of 1,779	Lloyd's Register	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.