Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

MYRA SEAWAYS

IMO: 9422122
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 5,865 t
Flag (estimated): Turkiye
Port of registry: Istanbul
Technical efficiency: EEXI 12.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CUNEYT SOLAKOGLU

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S. · part of DFDS

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,434 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

125

Ro-ro median 109 kg/nm (+14%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

71.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 103 (−30%)

Average speed

18.0 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+25%)

Fuel per day at sea

54.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,241 t

CO₂ emitted

41,245 t

Distance sailed

105,912 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,883 h

245 days, 67% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 118 kg/nm · median 105 (+13%)

56.6Ranks 155 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 17.2 kn · median 14.4 (+19%)

10.9Faster than 90% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 62.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (−34%)

47.4Ranks 50 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU51%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

511 t

1.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MYRA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

100.0110.0120.0130.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MYRA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

14.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MYRA SEAWAYS
Ro-ro median

60.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+1%	+0%	+1%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−4%	−2%	+7%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+4%	+2%	−10%	+8%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	−7%	−10%	+12%	−10%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+1%	−0%	−0%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+0.7 kn	+2%	+6%	−4%	+8%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.5 kn	−1%	−8%	−15%	−2%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	13,726	42,758	116,277	6,776	17.2	118	62.7	–
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	13,500	42,071	115,201	6,698	17.2	117	64.3	–
2023	not published	13,079	40,742	107,238	6,373	16.8	122	66.5	–
2022	not published	13,898	43,293	118,692	6,923	17.1	117	61.7	–
2021	not published	13,284	41,384	105,521	5,925	17.8	126	68.6	–
2020	not published	13,241	41,245	105,912	5,883	18.0	125	71.7	–
2019	not published	13,600	42,368	110,581	6,387	17.3	123	66.4	–
2018	not published	16,123	50,220	130,134	6,931	18.8	124	67.5	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	62.7	95.2	−34%	50 of 235	DNV	B
2024	DFDS DENIZCILIK VE TASIMACILIK A.S.	64.3	97.5	−34%	46 of 220	DNV	A
2023	not published	66.5	109	−39%	45 of 221	DNV	A
2022	not published	61.7	90.6	−32%	39 of 223	DNV	A
2021	not published	68.6	104	−34%	58 of 219	Lloyd's Register	A
2020	not published	71.7	103	−30%	62 of 238	Lloyd's Register	A
2019	not published	66.4	90.9	−27%	66 of 271	Lloyd's Register	–
2018	not published	67.5	91.0	−26%	65 of 260	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.