Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

AMANDINE

IMO: 9424871
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 4,564 t
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SHIPLUX II S.A. · part of Shiplux

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,564 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

105.1 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

72.64

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (−24%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,998 t

CO₂ emitted

18,926 t

19,221 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

57,093 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,957 h

165 days, 45% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 105.1 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+0%)

56.6Ranks 119 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 14.4 (+0%)

10.9Faster than 50% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 72.64 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (−24%)

47.35Ranks 67 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU41%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU8%

4% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (726 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

7.7%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.3 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AMANDINE
Ro-ro median

102.5105.0107.5110.0112.5115.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AMANDINE
Ro-ro median

13.814.014.314.514.815.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AMANDINE
Ro-ro median

40.060.080.0100120

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−1%	+0%	−5%	+18%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−1%	−1%	−8%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−0%	+3%	+8%	−11%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+1%	−4%	−23%	+18%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−7%	−4%	+10%	−6%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	+0%	−5%	−19%	−2%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.9 kn	+4%	+11%	+112%	+16%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	SHIPLUX II S.A.	5,702	17,991	54,236	3,762	14.4	105.1	70.94	–
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	5,998	18,926	57,093	3,957	14.4	105.1	72.64	–
2024	SHIPLUX II S.A.	6,376	20,113	59,952	4,216	14.2	106.4	61.55	–
2023	not published	6,951	21,911	64,898	4,541	14.3	107.1	61.20	–
2022	not published	6,441	20,303	60,093	4,336	13.9	107.2	68.60	–
2021	not published	8,332	26,177	78,216	5,420	14.4	106.5	58.11	–
2020	not published	8,163	25,745	71,297	5,087	14.0	114.5	61.99	–
2019	not published	10,050	31,643	87,984	5,922	14.9	114.2	63.43	–
2018	not published	4,545	14,309	41,488	2,968	14.0	109.5	54.91	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	SHIPLUX II S.A.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A+C
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	72.64	95.19	−24%	67 of 235	DNV	A+C
2024	SHIPLUX II S.A.	61.55	97.53	−37%	38 of 220	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	61.20	108.62	−44%	33 of 221	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	68.60	90.62	−24%	64 of 223	DNV	C
2021	not published	58.11	103.64	−44%	30 of 219	DNV	C
2020	not published	61.99	102.77	−40%	42 of 238	DNV	C
2019	not published	63.43	90.89	−30%	58 of 271	DNV	C
2018	not published	54.91	91.03	−40%	40 of 260	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.