Navalyze · Container · Ship

SANTA RITA

IMO: 9425382
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 52,545 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: KØBenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 29,588 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

243

Container median 172 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

25.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+46%)

Average speed

15.4 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

89.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

20,336 t

CO₂ emitted

63,547 t

Distance sailed

83,700 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,436 h

227 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 226 kg/nm · median 177 (+28%)

78.8Ranks 1,444 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.3 kn · median 13.3 (+15%)

9.1Faster than 81% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−18%)

7.22Ranks 883 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU36%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

20,336 t

100% of all fuel; 0% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

998 t

1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SANTA RITA
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SANTA RITA
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SANTA RITA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.9 kn	−10%	−4%	−21%	+5%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.9 kn	+44%	+55%	+20%	+31%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 44%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	−30%	−31%	−13%	+70%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 30%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.2 kn	+13%	+3%	+68%	−60%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.4 kn	−10%	−12%	−52%	−44%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	12,682	39,320	56,138	3,665	15.3	226	13.3	88%
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	17,717	54,208	70,643	4,892	14.4	251	12.7	98%
2023	not published	10,198	31,901	58,632	4,354	13.5	174	9.76	98%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	16,709	23,457	67,716	4,924	13.8	247	5.73	98%
2021	not published	8,826	27,587	40,316	2,684	15.0	219	14.5	–
2020	not published	20,336	63,547	83,700	5,436	15.4	243	25.7	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	13.3	16.3	−18%	883 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024Bio blend	Maersk A/S	12.7	17.5	−27%	663 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	9.76	19.4	−50%	368 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	5.73	19.1	−70%	18 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	14.5	17.9	−19%	680 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	25.7	17.6	+46%	1,244 of 1,797	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.