Navalyze · Container · Ship

SANTA URSULA

IMO: 9430387
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 60,773 t
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 60,773 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

230.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (+30%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.81

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (−28%)

Average speed

17.1 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+29%)

Fuel per day at sea

94.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,011 t

CO₂ emitted

31,211 t

31,702 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

43,485 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,543 h

106 days, 29% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 230.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (+30%)

78.8Ranks 1,488 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 17.1 kn · median 13.3 (+29%)

9.1Faster than 98% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.81 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (−28%)

7.22Ranks 773 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU34%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU1%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (17,609 t).

Fuel burned laden

99%

1% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SANTA URSULA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SANTA URSULA
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SANTA URSULA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+14%	+21%	+11%	+16%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2024	−2.2 kn	−37%	−45%	+472%	+68%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.4 kn	+15%	+32%	−91%	−58%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+14%	+17%	+5%	−11%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.0 kn	−11%	−21%	−15%	−5%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+9%	+4%	+43%	+7%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	10,011	31,211	43,485	2,543	17.1	230.2	11.81	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	7,935	24,751	39,189	2,436	16.1	202.5	10.19	100%
2022LNG	not published	2,218	1,911	6,856	375	18.3	323.6	6.05	26%
2021LNG	not published	22,240	60,878	78,916	4,949	15.9	281.8	14.47	–
2020LNG	not published	18,518	52,323	74,853	4,800	15.6	247.4	16.26	100%
2019	not published	24,460	76,305	88,395	5,027	17.6	276.7	17.06	100%
2018	not published	15,679	48,979	61,864	3,354	18.4	253.4	15.93	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	11.81	16.30	−28%	773 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	10.19	17.52	−42%	464 of 1,974	ABS	C
2022LNG	not published	6.05	19.13	−68%	38 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021LNG	not published	14.47	17.90	−19%	677 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020LNG	not published	16.26	17.58	−8%	807 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.06	18.88	−10%	790 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	15.93	20.22	−21%	598 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.