Navalyze · Container · Ship

SANTA URSULA

IMO: 9430387
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 60,773 t
Flag (estimated): Denmark
Port of registry: Kobenhavn
Technical efficiency: EEXI 11.30 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Maersk A/S · part of Maersk

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 53,312 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

282

Container median 186 kg/nm (+52%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (−19%)

Average speed

15.9 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

107.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

22,240 t

CO₂ emitted

60,878 t

Distance sailed

78,916 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,949 h

206 days, 56% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 230 kg/nm · median 177 (+30%)

78.8Ranks 1,488 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 17.1 kn · median 13.3 (+29%)

9.1Faster than 98% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−28%)

7.22Ranks 773 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU43%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,053 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SANTA URSULA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SANTA URSULA
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SANTA URSULA
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.0 kn	+14%	+21%	+11%	+16%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2024	−2.2 kn	−37%	−45%	+472%	+68%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.4 kn	+15%	+32%	−91%	−58%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+14%	+17%	+5%	−11%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−2.0 kn	−11%	−21%	−15%	−5%	2.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+9%	+4%	+43%	+7%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Maersk A/S	10,011	31,211	43,485	2,543	17.1	230	11.8	99%
2024	Maersk A/S	7,935	24,751	39,189	2,436	16.1	203	10.2	100%
2022LNG / alt.	not published	2,218	1,911	6,856	375	18.3	324	6.05	26%
2021LNG / alt.	not published	22,240	60,878	78,916	4,949	15.9	282	14.5	–
2020LNG / alt.	not published	18,518	52,323	74,853	4,800	15.6	247	16.3	100%
2019	not published	24,460	76,305	88,395	5,027	17.6	277	17.1	100%
2018	not published	15,679	48,979	61,864	3,354	18.4	253	15.9	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Maersk A/S	11.8	16.3	−28%	773 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	Maersk A/S	10.2	17.5	−42%	464 of 1,974	ABS	C
2022LNG / alt.	not published	6.05	19.1	−68%	38 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021LNG / alt.	not published	14.5	17.9	−19%	677 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020LNG / alt.	not published	16.3	17.6	−8%	807 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	17.1	18.9	−10%	790 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	15.9	20.2	−21%	598 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.