Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL NUAMAN

IMO
9431135
Type
LNG carrier
Flag (estimated)
Marshall Islands
Port of registry
Majuro, Marshall Islands
Technical efficiency
EEXI 7.76 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm
360
LNG carrier median 231 kg/nm (+56%)
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
14.3
g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 9.10 (+57%)
Average speed
14.1 kn
LNG carrier median 14.2 kn (−1%)
Fuel per day at sea
121.5 t/day
Fuel consumed
12,891 t
CO₂ emitted
40,182 t
Distance sailed
35,857 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,547 h
106 days, 29% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 302 kg/nm · median 205 (+48%)
148Ranks 259 of 312, lowest first328
Average speedThis ship 15.2 kn · median 14.6 (+4%)
11.0Faster than 69% of LNG carrier ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.10 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+23%)
4.54Ranks 201 of 312, lowest first17.3
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU54%
  • Into the EU44%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
771 t
1.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • AL NUAMAN
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • AL NUAMAN
  • LNG carrier median

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

  • AL NUAMAN
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2024+1.1 kn−16%−9%+104%−36%1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.9 kn+4%+11%+29%+44%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−1.1 kn−2%−9%−47%−32%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−0.3 kn+11%+8%−31%+52%Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+0.2 kn−10%−9%+158%−11%Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+2.6 kn+0%+22%−15%−2%2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited22,10668,59973,1554,81515.2302–55%
2023not published12,89140,18235,8572,54714.1360––
2022not published9,63230,08627,8632,10413.2346–58%
2021not published18,50657,37452,2413,66514.3354–55%
2020not published24,23775,40975,7485,18914.6320–52%
2019not published10,47232,78529,3282,03414.4357–52%
2018not published12,30738,22634,5562,91911.8356–53%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2024Shell International Trading and Shipping Company Limited9.107.39+23%201 of 312Lloyd's RegisterB
2023not published14.39.10+57%307 of 355Lloyd's RegisterB
2022not published9.9510.4−4%179 of 379Lloyd's RegisterB
2021not published14.710.5+40%227 of 289Lloyd's RegisterB
2020not published9.6710.7−10%107 of 267Lloyd's RegisterB
2019not published10.910.9−0%124 of 248Lloyd's RegisterB
2018not published11.010.9+1%101 of 197Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.