Navalyze · Container · Ship

NAVIOS DORADO

IMO: 9431707
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 30,184 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.82 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: NILEDUTCH OKAPI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Navios Containers Management · part of Navios

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 20,410 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

172

Container median 182 kg/nm (−6%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

26.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (+30%)

Average speed

14.4 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

59.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,310 t

CO₂ emitted

32,220 t

Distance sailed

60,071 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,169 h

174 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 171 kg/nm · median 167 (+2%)

78.9Ranks 1,015 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 13.5 (+1%)

9.6Faster than 52% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.7 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (+1%)

7.33Ranks 993 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU40%
Into the EU31%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,331 t

4.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NAVIOS DORADO
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

NAVIOS DORADO
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NAVIOS DORADO
Container median

15.017.520.022.525.027.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	+1.7 kn	−9%	+4%	−20%	+1%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−18%	−28%	+23%	−6%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	+9%	+3%	−28%	+10%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	+13%	+15%	+14%	−0%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	+1%	−5%	−73%	−31%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.6 kn	+7%	+11%	+21%	−6%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Navios Containers Management	2,730	8,526	15,994	1,175	13.6	171	17.7	–
2023	not published	3,732	11,639	19,894	1,678	11.9	188	17.5	–
2022	not published	3,690	11,501	16,160	1,189	13.6	228	18.7	–
2021	not published	4,717	14,699	22,569	1,569	14.4	209	17.0	99%
2020	not published	3,665	11,418	19,749	1,404	14.1	186	17.0	–
2019	not published	13,347	41,694	72,801	4,842	15.0	183	24.8	–
2018	not published	10,310	32,220	60,071	4,169	14.4	172	26.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	Navios Containers Management	17.7	17.5	+1%	993 of 1,974	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	17.5	19.4	−10%	853 of 1,899	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	18.7	19.1	−2%	889 of 1,825	ICS Verification Services	B
2021	not published	17.0	17.9	−5%	839 of 1,781	ABS	B
2020	not published	17.0	17.6	−3%	857 of 1,797	ABS	B
2019	not published	24.8	18.9	+31%	1,118 of 1,788	ABS	B
2018	not published	26.3	20.2	+30%	1,081 of 1,705	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.