Navalyze · Container · Ship

CAUCEDO EXPRESS

IMO: 9434931
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 17,447 t
Port of registry: St. Johns
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.88 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: MAERSK NIMES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,447 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

128.4 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.01

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+41%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,280 t

CO₂ emitted

22,770 t

23,128 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

56,719 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,155 h

173 days, 47% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 128.4 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−27%)

78.8Ranks 771 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.3 (+3%)

9.1Faster than 55% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.01 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+41%)

7.22Ranks 1,482 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU44%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU2%

53% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (12,050 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.4 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CAUCEDO EXPRESS
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CAUCEDO EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CAUCEDO EXPRESS
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−9%	−14%	−0%	−3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+8%	+11%	+23%	−20%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−0%	+4%	+43%	+36%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+7%	−1%	−54%	−24%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+12%	+11%	−21%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−15%	−18%	+10%	+24%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−4%	−6%	−10%	−0%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	7,280	22,770	56,719	4,155	13.7	128.4	23.01	–
2024part-year	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	4,957	15,522	35,598	2,371	15.0	139.2	23.80	98%
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	8,026	25,110	56,737	3,932	14.4	141.5	23.69	61%
2023	not published	6,061	19,049	46,184	3,299	14.0	131.2	29.57	98%
2022	not published	4,236	13,312	32,202	2,385	13.5	131.5	21.78	97%
2021	not published	8,548	26,756	69,398	4,765	14.6	123.2	28.53	96%
2020	not published	9,642	30,102	87,385	5,936	14.7	110.3	25.40	100%
2019	not published	10,319	32,240	79,082	5,213	15.2	130.5	20.55	100%
2018	not published	11,860	37,081	87,521	5,618	15.6	135.5	20.62	95%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	23.01	16.30	+41%	1,482 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024part-year	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	–	–	–	–	ABS	B+C
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	23.69	17.52	+35%	1,279 of 1,974	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	29.57	19.40	+52%	1,341 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	21.78	19.13	+14%	1,026 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	28.53	17.90	+59%	1,261 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	25.40	17.58	+44%	1,233 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	20.55	18.88	+9%	987 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	20.62	20.22	+2%	870 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.