Navalyze · Container · Ship

CAUCEDO EXPRESS

IMO: 9434931
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 17,447 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St. Johns
Technical efficiency: EEXI 16.88 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: MAERSK NIMES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,513 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

123

Container median 186 kg/nm (−34%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+59%)

Average speed

14.6 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,548 t

CO₂ emitted

26,756 t

Distance sailed

69,398 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,765 h

199 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 128 kg/nm · median 177 (−27%)

78.8Ranks 771 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.7 kn · median 13.3 (+3%)

9.1Faster than 55% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.0 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+41%)

7.22Ranks 1,482 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports4%
From the EU53%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

8,198 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

645 t

2.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CAUCEDO EXPRESS
Container median

100.0120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CAUCEDO EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CAUCEDO EXPRESS
Container median

15.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	−9%	−14%	−0%	−3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+8%	+11%	+23%	−20%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−0%	+4%	+43%	+36%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+7%	−1%	−54%	−24%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+12%	+11%	−21%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.5 kn	−15%	−18%	+10%	+24%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	−4%	−6%	−10%	−0%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	7,280	22,770	56,719	4,155	13.7	128	23.0	–
2024part-year	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	4,957	15,522	35,598	2,371	15.0	139	23.8	98%
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	8,026	25,110	56,737	3,932	14.4	142	23.7	61%
2023	not published	6,061	19,049	46,184	3,299	14.0	131	29.6	98%
2022	not published	4,236	13,312	32,202	2,385	13.5	132	21.8	97%
2021	not published	8,548	26,756	69,398	4,765	14.6	123	28.5	96%
2020	not published	9,642	30,102	87,385	5,936	14.7	110	25.4	100%
2019	not published	10,319	32,240	79,082	5,213	15.2	131	20.6	100%
2018	not published	11,860	37,081	87,521	5,618	15.6	136	20.6	95%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Danz Shipping GmbH & Co. KG	23.0	16.3	+41%	1,482 of 2,208	DNV	B
2024part-year	Anglo-Eastern (Germany) GmbH	–	–	–	–	ABS	B+C
2024	DT-Bereederungs GmbH & Co. KG	23.7	17.5	+35%	1,279 of 1,974	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	29.6	19.4	+52%	1,341 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	21.8	19.1	+14%	1,026 of 1,825	ABS	C
2021	not published	28.5	17.9	+59%	1,261 of 1,781	ABS	C
2020	not published	25.4	17.6	+44%	1,233 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	20.6	18.9	+9%	987 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	20.6	20.2	+2%	870 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.