SAMSKIP INNOVATOR

IMO: 9436214
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,584 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 29.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Erik Schepers" HS Schiffahrts UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG · part of HS Schiffahrt (Schepers)

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,584 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

73.2 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−59%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

64.00

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+293%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (+0%)

Fuel per day at sea

23.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,118 t

CO₂ emitted

12,893 t

13,095 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

56,211 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,212 h

176 days, 48% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 73.2 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−59%)

78.8Ranks 146 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 50% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 64.00 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+293%)

7.22Ranks 2,137 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU48%
Into the EU47%
At berth in the EU3%

10% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,287 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SAMSKIP INNOVATOR
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SAMSKIP INNOVATOR
Container median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SAMSKIP INNOVATOR
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−0%	+1%	+0%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+2%	−2%	−5%	+31%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.4 kn	−9%	−6%	−2%	+231%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+9%	+6%	+6%	−78%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−4%	+1%	+16%	+8%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−1%	+6%	+44%	+5%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+2%	−6%	−39%	+9%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MS "Erik Schepers" HS Schiffahrts UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	4,118	12,893	56,211	4,212	13.3	73.2	64.00	–
2024	Nav-Tech BV	4,121	12,907	56,126	4,272	13.1	73.4	66.39	–
2023	not published	4,266	13,441	59,173	4,344	13.6	72.1	50.65	–
2022LNG	not published	4,820	4,108	60,564	4,600	13.2	79.6	15.31	–
2021	not published	4,166	13,126	56,970	4,197	13.6	73.1	70.55	–
2020	not published	3,733	11,784	49,245	3,814	12.9	75.8	65.04	–
2019	not published	2,630	8,305	34,248	2,845	12.0	76.8	61.95	–
2018	not published	4,231	13,351	56,263	4,307	13.1	75.2	57.05	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "Erik Schepers" HS Schiffahrts UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG	64.00	16.30	+293%	2,137 of 2,208	Swiss Climate	B
2024	Nav-Tech BV	66.39	17.52	+279%	1,891 of 1,974	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	50.65	19.40	+161%	1,690 of 1,899	DNV	A+B+C
2022LNG	not published	15.31	19.13	−20%	723 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	70.55	17.90	+294%	1,736 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	65.04	17.58	+270%	1,723 of 1,797	DNV	B
2019	not published	61.95	18.88	+228%	1,670 of 1,788	DNV	B
2018	not published	57.05	20.22	+182%	1,552 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.