Navalyze · Market view · Compare
Compare operators, 2024
Pick a company or group, then the competitors to hold it against, or compare verifiers. Every figure comes from the public THETIS-MRV reports for EU and EEA voyages.
- Nav-Tech BVyour view
Side by side
All 2024 reports of each operator, across every ship type. Change is against 2023 where the operator reported then.
| Nav-Tech BV | |
|---|---|
| Ships | 6 |
| CO₂ emitted | 90 kt |
| Fuel per mile | 70 kg/nm |
| Average speed | 13.4 kn |
| CO₂ at berth | 5.3% |
| Ships burning LNG | 2 |
| Main segment | Container |
Fuel per mile and speed depend on ship size and type; compare them within a segment below.
Segment by segment
Efficiency only compares within a ship type. Each row gives the CO₂ per transport work of an operator's typical (median) ship, and the bar sets it against the typical ship of the whole segment: to the left of the line it emits less CO₂ for the same transport work, to the right more.
Container
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 17.5
- Nav-Tech BV53.1 (+203% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nav-Tech BV | 4 | 53.1 | +203% | 82 | 14.1 | 5,173 | 3.9% | – |
| Segment median | 17.5 | 0% |
Ro-ro
CO₂ per transport work (cargo) in g CO₂/t·nm · segment median 97.5
- Nav-Tech BV61.9 (−36% vs median)
- ← bettersegment medianworse →
| Ships | Per work | vs median | Fuel kg/nm | Speed kn | Hours at sea | At berth | LNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nav-Tech BV | 2 | 61.9 | −36% | 44 | 12.0 | 5,486 | 11.8% | 2 |
| Segment median | 97.5 | 0% |
Verification and monitoring
Who verifies each operator's reports, and which MRV methods its ships use to measure fuel (share of reports).
| Verifiers (ships) | A · delivery notes | B · tank monitoring | C · flow meters | D · direct | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nav-Tech BV | DNV (6) | 33% | 100% | 33% | 0% |
Nav-Tech BV: ships furthest from their peers
Each ship's CO₂ per transport work against the median ship of its type and size band. +100% means the ship emits twice as much CO₂ for the same transport work as a typical ship of its size. Ro-pax ships show passenger figures, with freight underneath.
| Ship | IMO | Segment | CO₂ per transport work | Size-band median | vs median | Speed kn | CO₂ | Allowances |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMSKIP INNOVATOR | 9436214 | Container | 66.4 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +41% | 13.1 | 12,907 t | €202k |
| HELGAFELL | 9306017 | Container | 54.3 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +15% | 14.7 | 22,564 t | €414k |
| ARNARFELL | 9306005 | Container | 51.8 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +10% | 14.2 | 21,416 t | €432k |
| SAMSKIP ENDEAVOUR | 9436290 | Container | 48.6 g CO₂/t·nm | 47.2 | +3% | 14.1 | 17,709 t | €518k |
| SAMSKIP KVITBJØRNLNG | 9642564 | Ro-ro | 63.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 163 | −61% | 12.1 | 8,125 t | €243k |
| SAMSKIP KVITNOSLNG | 9642576 | Ro-ro | 59.9 g CO₂/t·nm | 163 | −63% | 11.8 | 7,395 t | €219k |
30 of 6 reports shown. A high ratio can mean an older or faster-sailing ship, short trades with much time manoeuvring, or part-loaded voyages; it marks where to look first.
Notes
- Companies are ISM companies (Document of Compliance holders) as named in THETIS, usually the ship manager.
- Groups combine ISM companies matched on name and known ownership. If a company is in the wrong group, tell us at info@navalyze.com.
- Efficiency figures use full-year reports with fuel; totals include part-year reports.
- Euro figures use the EUA price set at the top of the page.
- Verifier names vary by entity and year (for example DNV AS and DNV Hellas); they are rolled up into one brand. A verifier's figures cover the ships whose 2024 report it verified.