Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ARKLOW MANOR

IMO: 9440241
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 8,145 t
Flag (estimated): Ireland
Port of registry: Arklow
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arklow Shipping ULC · part of Arklow

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

61.4

General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+11%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

22.7

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.5 (−7%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

General cargo median 10.7 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,275 t

CO₂ emitted

7,194 t

Distance sailed

37,060 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,500 h

146 days, 40% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 59.7 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+70%)

17.4Ranks 2,050 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 9.3 (+11%)

6.9Faster than 70% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 23.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−9%)

10.2Ranks 1,116 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports89%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

817 t

11.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ARKLOW MANOR
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARKLOW MANOR
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ARKLOW MANOR
General cargo median

18.020.022.024.026.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−4%	−3%	+3%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	−14%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+1%	−6%	−2%	−6%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	+4%	+10%	+6%	+2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−6%	−8%	−2%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	−10%	+24%	+4%	−8%	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+16%	+12%	−10%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arklow Shipping ULC	1,985	6,289	33,255	3,220	10.3	59.7	23.2	59%
2024	Arklow Shipping ULC	2,027	6,396	32,399	3,209	10.1	62.5	23.7	–
2023	not published	2,270	7,202	37,707	3,696	10.2	60.2	21.7	–
2022	not published	2,286	7,217	38,304	3,496	11.0	59.7	23.0	–
2021	not published	2,092	6,628	36,281	3,503	10.4	57.6	22.6	–
2020	not published	2,275	7,194	37,060	3,500	10.6	61.4	–	–
2019	not published	2,429	7,670	35,625	4,622	7.7	68.2	24.7	–
2018	not published	2,347	7,392	39,799	5,003	8.0	59.0	20.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arklow Shipping ULC	23.2	25.5	−9%	1,116 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Arklow Shipping ULC	23.7	19.3	+23%	735 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	21.7	20.7	+5%	575 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	23.0	21.6	+7%	562 of 1,034	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	22.6	22.7	−0%	566 of 1,142	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	22.7	24.5	−7%	501 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	24.7	25.0	−1%	570 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	20.1	24.9	−19%	345 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.