Navalyze · Container · Ship

NINA A

IMO: 9440605
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,133 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ALINDA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,333 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

69.2

Container median 174 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

64.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+243%)

Average speed

13.3 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,259 t

CO₂ emitted

19,534 t

Distance sailed

90,432 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,808 h

284 days, 78% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 74.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 163 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 9.0 kn · median 13.3 (−32%)

9.1Faster than 10% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 56.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+247%)

7.22Ranks 2,091 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports97%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

572 t

2.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NINA A
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NINA A
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NINA A
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.1 kn	+15%	+4%	+15%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+1%	−9%	−42%	–	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2023	−0.8 kn	−12%	−18%	−20%	+78%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	+8%	+11%	−38%	−24%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−1.8 kn	−2%	−15%	−26%	−3%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	−15%	−3%	+53%	+5%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	1,661	5,208	22,284	2,466	9.0	74.5	56.6	–
2024part-year	Dohle Shipmanagement Limited	947	2,963	15,198	1,539	9.9	62.3	452	–
2024	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	1,246	3,901	19,301	1,912	10.1	64.6	160	–
2023	not published	2,124	6,623	33,187	2,986	11.1	64.0	85.8	–
2021	not published	3,024	9,615	41,537	3,493	11.9	72.8	48.3	–
2020	not published	4,507	14,163	66,676	5,775	11.5	67.6	63.1	–
2019	not published	6,259	19,534	90,432	6,808	13.3	69.2	64.8	–
2018	not published	4,799	15,071	59,227	5,045	11.7	81.0	61.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	56.6	16.3	+247%	2,091 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024part-year	Dohle Shipmanagement Limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	Doehle Shipmanagement Pte. Ltd.	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2023	not published	85.8	19.4	+342%	1,888 of 1,899	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	48.3	17.9	+170%	1,580 of 1,781	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	63.1	17.6	+259%	1,705 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	64.8	18.9	+243%	1,691 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	61.7	20.2	+205%	1,582 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.