Navalyze · Container · Ship

NAGOYA EXPRESS

IMO: 9450428
Type: Container ship
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.26 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: HL Crewmanagement GmbH

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 67,298 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

250

Container median 178 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.7

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−39%)

Average speed

14.9 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

89.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,121 t

CO₂ emitted

16,106 t

Distance sailed

20,490 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,373 h

57 days, 16% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 199 kg/nm · median 167 (+19%)

78.9Ranks 1,178 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.1 kn · median 13.5 (−3%)

9.6Faster than 43% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−16%)

7.33Ranks 807 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU50%
Into the EU36%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,227 t

7.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

NAGOYA EXPRESS
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NAGOYA EXPRESS
Container median

13.013.514.014.515.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NAGOYA EXPRESS
Container median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	−1.7 kn	+2%	−10%	+53%	−13%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−22%	−22%	+138%	+46%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.4 kn	+13%	+25%	+23%	+17%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2021	−0.7 kn	−1%	−5%	+130%	−40%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025part-year	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	14,855	46,466	74,712	5,693	13.1	199	14.8	–
2023	not published	9,534	29,525	48,733	3,294	14.8	196	17.0	–
2022	not published	5,121	16,106	20,490	1,373	14.9	250	11.7	–
2021	not published	3,671	11,566	16,613	1,227	13.5	221	10.0	–
2018	not published	1,613	5,038	7,221	510	14.2	223	16.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	–	–	–	–	DNV	B
2025	Hapag-Lloyd AG	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	HL Crewmanagement GmbH	14.8	17.5	−16%	807 of 1,974	DNV	B
2023	not published	17.0	19.4	−12%	826 of 1,899	EnvService	B
2022	not published	11.7	19.1	−39%	462 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	10.0	17.9	−44%	322 of 1,781	DNV	B
2018	not published	16.8	20.2	−17%	665 of 1,705	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.