Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

SENATA

IMO: 9451575
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 6,270 t
Flag (estimated): Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry: St John'S
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.91 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: INTRESCO Ltd-UKE

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,074 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

36.5

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+122%)

Average speed

8.3 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (−28%)

Fuel per day at sea

7.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,330 t

CO₂ emitted

4,211 t

Distance sailed

36,408 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,387 h

183 days, 50% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 46.1 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−44%)

61.0Ranks 54 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 7.2 kn · median 10.7 (−33%)

8.8Faster than 4% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+196%)

4.80Ranks 3,427 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports2%
From the EU48%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

97 t

2.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SENATA
Bulk carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SENATA
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SENATA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	+7%	−10%	−21%	+59%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+3%	+13%	+38%	−3%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+2%	+0%	−20%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	+13%	+8%	−5%	−9%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	−4%	−4%	−22%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+2.5 kn	−2%	+41%	+94%	+9%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	−3%	+2%	+26%	+15%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	INTRESCO Ltd-UKE	1,390	4,420	30,153	4,181	7.2	46.1	23.4	–
2024	INTRESCO Ltd-UKE	1,644	5,188	38,287	4,433	8.6	42.9	14.7	–
2023	not published	1,157	3,665	27,648	3,511	7.9	41.8	15.2	–
2022	not published	1,416	4,496	34,472	4,309	8.0	41.1	17.3	–
2021	not published	1,330	4,211	36,408	4,387	8.3	36.5	19.0	–
2020	not published	1,777	5,623	46,873	5,638	8.3	37.9	18.2	–
2019	not published	934	2,934	24,186	4,163	5.8	38.6	16.7	–
2018	not published	766	2,409	19,173	3,457	5.5	39.9	14.5	76%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	INTRESCO Ltd-UKE	23.4	7.90	+196%	3,427 of 3,611	Verifavia	A
2024	INTRESCO Ltd-UKE	14.7	8.09	+82%	2,731 of 3,089	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	15.2	8.27	+84%	3,101 of 3,548	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	17.3	8.71	+99%	3,591 of 3,968	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	19.0	8.57	+122%	3,275 of 3,466	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	18.2	8.24	+121%	2,974 of 3,150	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	16.7	8.38	+99%	3,098 of 3,360	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	14.5	8.50	+70%	2,954 of 3,384	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.