Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

GAZ ENERGY

IMO: 9458169
Type: Gas carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,192 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 9.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd · part of Naftomar

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,192 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

83.8 kg/nm

Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (+3%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

51.48

g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+45%)

Average speed

8.0 kn

Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−37%)

Fuel per day at sea

16.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,272 t

CO₂ emitted

4,058 t

4,120 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

15,180 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,887 h

79 days, 22% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.8 kg/nm · median 81.5 (+3%)

49.8Ranks 193 of 355, lowest first124.4

Average speedThis ship 8.0 kn · median 12.6 (−37%)

8.8Faster than 7% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.48 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+45%)

14.36Ranks 228 of 355, lowest first120.18

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU5%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,122 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

GAZ ENERGY
Gas carrier (LPG) median

80.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

GAZ ENERGY
Gas carrier (LPG) median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

GAZ ENERGY
Gas carrier (LPG) median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−2.9 kn	−4%	−30%	−53%	+16%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	−16%	−28%	+4%	−40%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−27%	−29%	+82%	−19%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.0 kn	+44%	+69%	−54%	+43%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 44%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−5.2 kn	−11%	−39%	+106%	−19%	5.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+8.2 kn	+12%	+124%	−16%	−4%	8.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.6 kn	−13%	−40%	+50%	−3%	3.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd	1,272	4,058	15,180	1,887	8.0	83.8	51.48	–
2024	Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd	2,818	8,815	32,149	2,941	10.9	87.6	44.57	–
2023	not published	3,209	10,067	30,805	2,401	12.8	104.2	73.72	–
2022	not published	2,424	7,569	16,966	1,284	13.2	142.9	90.47	–
2021	not published	3,692	11,515	37,186	3,306	11.2	99.3	63.31	–
2020	not published	2,022	6,327	18,027	1,101	16.4	112.1	78.15	–
2019	not published	2,159	6,740	21,520	2,625	8.2	100.3	81.38	–
2018	not published	1,661	5,185	14,367	1,221	11.8	115.6	84.23	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Gas carrier (LPG) median	vs Gas carrier (LPG)	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd	51.48	35.56	+45%	228 of 355	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd	44.57	35.82	+24%	185 of 306	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	73.72	41.77	+76%	233 of 330	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	90.47	42.53	+113%	281 of 348	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	63.31	46.91	+35%	203 of 323	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	78.15	42.29	+85%	252 of 339	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	81.38	45.85	+77%	241 of 331	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	84.23	53.11	+59%	200 of 297	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.