Navalyze · Container · Ship

MSC ROSA M

IMO: 9461398
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 115,329 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel (estimated): Oil blended with biofuel or another alternative fuel

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL · part of MSC Group

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 124,838 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

367

Container median 172 kg/nm (+113%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.27

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−47%)

Average speed

14.7 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

129.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,411 t

CO₂ emitted

54,924 t

Distance sailed

47,461 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,219 h

134 days, 37% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 355 kg/nm · median 177 (+101%)

78.8Ranks 2,146 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 13.3 (+19%)

9.1Faster than 87% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.53 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−42%)

7.22Ranks 526 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports46%
From the EU13%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,807 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MSC ROSA M
Container median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MSC ROSA M
Container median

13.014.015.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MSC ROSA M
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+4%	+4%	+206%	−41%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+2.4 kn	+10%	+29%	+53%	+75%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−16%	−22%	−78%	−14%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+3%	+6%	−4%	+15%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	−2%	−7%	−5%	−0%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	+13%	+28%	+86%	−8%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.0 kn	−20%	−35%	−27%	−10%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025Bio blend	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	15,567	48,196	43,851	2,779	15.8	355	9.53	–
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	4,889	15,236	14,352	910	15.8	341	16.1	–
2023	not published	2,924	9,238	9,404	700	13.4	311	9.17	–
2022	not published	16,048	50,620	43,145	3,011	14.3	372	10.7	–
2021	not published	16,236	51,205	45,171	3,221	14.0	359	9.24	–
2020	not published	17,411	54,924	47,461	3,219	14.7	367	9.27	–
2019	not published	8,278	25,871	25,495	1,960	13.0	325	10.0	–
2018	not published	14,287	44,536	35,039	2,192	16.0	408	11.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025Bio blend	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	9.53	16.3	−42%	526 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	MEDITERRANEAN SHIPPING CO SRL	16.1	17.5	−8%	896 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	9.17	19.4	−53%	321 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	10.7	19.1	−44%	367 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	9.24	17.9	−48%	267 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	9.27	17.6	−47%	325 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	10.0	18.9	−47%	322 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	11.1	20.2	−45%	331 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.