Navalyze · Container · Ship

CMA CGM DAKHLA

IMO: 9461594
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,487 t
Flag (estimated): Morocco
Port of registry: Casablanca
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.30 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: STEFAN SIBUM, CMA CGM MURCIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA SHIPS SAS · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,898 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

87.2

Container median 165 kg/nm (−47%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

71.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+268%)

Average speed

6.9 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (−48%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,162 t

CO₂ emitted

3,714 t

Distance sailed

13,332 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,926 h

80 days, 22% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 95.8 kg/nm · median 177 (−46%)

78.8Ranks 486 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 5.6 kn · median 13.3 (−58%)

9.1Faster than 1% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+188%)

7.22Ranks 1,987 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports6%
From the EU27%
Into the EU59%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

925 t

80% of all fuel; 20% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

274 t

7.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CMA CGM DAKHLA
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CMA CGM DAKHLA
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CMA CGM DAKHLA
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.4 kn	+3%	−27%	−72%	+3%	2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.1 kn	+6%	+23%	+84%	−36%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−5.8 kn	+1%	−45%	−82%	+88%	5.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	−3%	−2%	+6%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	+3%	+8%	+54%	−11%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	+1%	+7%	+3%	+45%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.4 kn	−9%	−5%	−26%	+3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	652	2,069	6,804	1,206	5.6	95.8	46.9	91%
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	2,283	7,191	24,592	3,073	8.0	92.8	45.7	91%
2023	not published	1,162	3,714	13,332	1,926	6.9	87.2	71.5	80%
2022	not published	6,296	19,732	72,835	5,720	12.7	86.4	38.0	–
2021	not published	6,108	19,136	68,499	5,460	12.5	89.2	38.5	–
2020	not published	3,854	12,111	44,471	3,713	12.0	86.7	43.2	–
2019	not published	3,726	11,627	43,299	3,860	11.2	86.0	29.8	–
2018	not published	5,484	17,234	58,289	5,398	10.8	94.1	28.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA SHIPS SAS	46.9	16.3	+188%	1,987 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA SHIPS SAS	45.7	17.5	+161%	1,696 of 1,974	ABS	C
2023	not published	71.5	19.4	+268%	1,855 of 1,899	ABS	C
2022	not published	38.0	19.1	+99%	1,451 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	38.5	17.9	+115%	1,460 of 1,781	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	43.2	17.6	+146%	1,518 of 1,797	Bureau Veritas	B
2019	not published	29.8	18.9	+58%	1,257 of 1,788	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	28.9	20.2	+43%	1,149 of 1,705	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.