Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL GWANGYANG

IMO: 9461879
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 99,271 t
Flag (estimated): Singapore
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.87 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 85,287 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

340

Container median 182 kg/nm (+87%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−39%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

130.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

11,826 t

CO₂ emitted

36,895 t

Distance sailed

34,830 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,179 h

91 days, 25% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 274 kg/nm · median 177 (+55%)

78.8Ranks 1,826 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 13.3 (+12%)

9.1Faster than 75% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.60 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−47%)

7.22Ranks 417 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU12%
Into the EU54%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,121 t

5.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL GWANGYANG
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL GWANGYANG
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL GWANGYANG
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	−3%	−3%	+1%	−2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2024	−2.1 kn	+11%	−3%	+221%	−52%	2.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2022	+1.7 kn	−20%	−12%	+23%	+77%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.1 kn	+6%	+5%	−62%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.5 kn	−11%	−13%	−6%	−27%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	13,630	42,518	49,803	3,345	14.9	274	8.60	97%
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	13,913	43,366	49,288	3,296	15.0	282	8.79	97%
2022	not published	3,921	12,378	15,352	900	17.1	255	18.1	97%
2020	not published	4,021	12,690	12,530	814	15.4	321	10.3	–
2019	not published	9,966	31,093	32,906	2,118	15.5	303	9.12	96%
2018	not published	11,826	36,895	34,830	2,179	16.0	340	12.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.60	16.3	−47%	417 of 2,208	ABS	C
2024	CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD	8.79	17.5	−50%	355 of 1,974	ABS	C
2022	not published	18.1	19.1	−5%	865 of 1,825	ABS	A
2020	not published	10.3	17.6	−42%	395 of 1,797	ABS	C
2019	not published	9.12	18.9	−52%	268 of 1,788	ABS	C
2018	not published	12.4	20.2	−39%	407 of 1,705	ABS	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.