Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL SALALAH

IMO
9462029
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
100,409 t
Flag (estimated)
Singapore
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEXI 8.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD · part of CMA CGM

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 95,197 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
252
Container median 165 kg/nm (+53%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
8.27
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−57%)
Average speed
12.9 kn
Container median 13.2 kn (−2%)
Fuel per day at sea
77.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
9,726 t
CO₂ emitted
30,405 t
Distance sailed
38,621 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,004 h
125 days, 34% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 251 kg/nm · median 177 (+42%)
78.8Ranks 1,656 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 13.3 (+6%)
9.1Faster than 62% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 7.79 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−52%)
7.22Ranks 314 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports29%
  • From the EU43%
  • Into the EU23%
  • At berth in the EU6%
Fuel burned laden
9,172 t
94% of all fuel; 6% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1,745 t
5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • APL SALALAH
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • APL SALALAH
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • APL SALALAH
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025+0.3 kn−6%−4%−34%−6%Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024+0.9 kn+6%+14%+45%+0%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2023+2.6 kn+45%+81%+211%+52%2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 45%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD9,25328,88236,9242,61714.12517.7998%
2024CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD14,90446,49056,0904,05713.82668.3197%
2023not published9,72630,40538,6213,00412.92528.2794%
2020not published2,1556,78912,4061,20310.31745.44100%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD7.7916.3−52%314 of 2,208ABSC
2024CMA CGM INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING COMPANY PTE LTD8.3117.5−53%300 of 1,974ABSC
2023not published8.2719.4−57%264 of 1,899ABSC
2020not published5.4417.6−69%16 of 1,797ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.