Navalyze · Container · Ship

CSCL URANUS

IMO: 9467304
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 101,548 t
Flag (estimated): Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry: Hong Kong
Technical efficiency: EEXI 8.67 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd. · part of COSCO Shipping

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 100,801 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

318

Container median 174 kg/nm (+83%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.84

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (−48%)

Average speed

17.1 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (+25%)

Fuel per day at sea

130.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

21,465 t

CO₂ emitted

66,881 t

Distance sailed

67,428 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,945 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 292 kg/nm · median 177 (+65%)

78.8Ranks 1,932 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 13.3 (+8%)

9.1Faster than 67% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.96 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−45%)

7.22Ranks 459 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports25%
From the EU29%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,886 t

2.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CSCL URANUS
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Average speed, kn

CSCL URANUS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CSCL URANUS
Container median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2022→2025	−2.7 kn	−11%	−25%	+18%	−28%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−5%	−7%	−47%	+15%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+9%	+9%	+15%	+13%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.5 kn	−1%	+2%	+4%	−2%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	+11%	+9%	−29%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	14,872	46,330	50,919	3,538	14.4	292	8.96	–
2022	not published	14,179	44,292	43,318	2,537	17.1	327	12.5	–
2021	not published	27,775	86,686	80,977	4,617	17.5	343	10.9	–
2020	not published	22,141	69,089	70,247	4,002	17.6	315	9.63	–
2019	not published	21,465	66,881	67,428	3,945	17.1	318	9.84	–
2018	not published	27,105	84,494	94,440	5,452	17.3	287	8.03	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shanghai Ocean Shipping Co.，Ltd.	8.96	16.3	−45%	459 of 2,208	China Classification Society	A
2022	not published	12.5	19.1	−35%	518 of 1,825	China Classification Society	A
2021	not published	10.9	17.9	−39%	392 of 1,781	China Classification Society	A
2020	not published	9.63	17.6	−45%	349 of 1,797	China Classification Society	A
2019	not published	9.84	18.9	−48%	306 of 1,788	China Classification Society	A
2018	not published	8.03	20.2	−60%	138 of 1,705	China Classification Society	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.