Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

CDRY BROWN

IMO: 9469302
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 4,227 t
Port of registry: Naples
Technical efficiency: EIV 14.70 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,227 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

42.2 kg/nm

General cargo median 35.3 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

31.98

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 25.45 (+26%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

General cargo median 9.3 kn (+16%)

Fuel per day at sea

10.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,579 t

CO₂ emitted

5,062 t

5,139 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

37,442 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,476 h

145 days, 40% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,706 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 42.2 kg/nm · median 35.3 (+20%)

17.4Ranks 1,640 of 2,706, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 9.3 (+16%)

7.0Faster than 76% of general cargo ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 31.98 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.45 (+26%)

10.14Ranks 1,889 of 2,706, lowest first52.37

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports67%
From the EU13%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU13%

90% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,562 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

13.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

CDRY BROWN
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CDRY BROWN
General cargo median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

CDRY BROWN
General cargo median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−11%	−10%	+11%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	+7%	+2%	−23%	+48%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+2%	+3%	+28%	−8%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	−1%	+9%	−16%	−9%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+0%	−5%	+21%	+4%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.8 kn	−2%	+34%	+3%	−1%	2.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.2 kn	−15%	−39%	+11%	–	3.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	1,579	5,062	37,442	3,476	10.8	42.2	31.98	–
2024	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	1,596	5,117	33,749	3,178	10.6	47.3	42.30	–
2023	not published	1,941	6,224	43,763	3,931	11.1	44.4	28.51	–
2022	not published	1,487	4,766	34,193	3,080	11.1	43.5	31.05	–
2021	not published	1,783	5,715	40,741	4,033	10.1	43.8	34.23	–
2020	not published	1,470	4,712	33,576	3,180	10.6	43.8	33.01	100%
2019	not published	1,446	4,528	32,522	4,170	7.8	44.5	33.18	–
2018	not published	1,525	4,777	29,304	2,664	11.0	52.1	0.91	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	31.98	25.45	+26%	1,889 of 2,706	RINA	B
2024	FLEGREA SHIPPING TECH S.R.L.	42.30	19.25	+120%	1,020 of 1,111	RINA	B
2023	not published	28.51	20.67	+38%	797 of 1,045	RINA	B
2022	not published	31.05	21.57	+44%	784 of 1,034	RINA	B
2021	not published	34.23	22.70	+51%	944 of 1,142	RINA	B
2020	not published	33.01	24.50	+35%	871 of 1,167	RINA	B
2019	not published	33.18	24.96	+33%	831 of 1,154	RINA	B
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.