Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

COSCO FAITH

IMO
9472141
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
83,479 t
Flag (estimated)
Hong Kong (China)
Port of registry
Hong Kong
Technical efficiency
EEXI 8.84 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.

?
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 71,414 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
316
Container median 165 kg/nm (+91%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
13.8
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (−29%)
Average speed
15.0 kn
Container median 13.2 kn (+14%)
Fuel per day at sea
113.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
11,936 t
CO₂ emitted
37,199 t
Distance sailed
37,773 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,518 h
105 days, 29% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 257 kg/nm · median 167 (+54%)
78.9Ranks 1,500 of 1,974, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 16.8 kn · median 13.5 (+24%)
9.6Faster than 96% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.59 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−45%)
7.33Ranks 420 of 1,974, lowest first51.6
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports15%
  • From the EU67%
  • Into the EU15%
  • At berth in the EU3%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,135 t
3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • COSCO FAITH
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • COSCO FAITH
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • COSCO FAITH
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2023→2024+1.8 kn−19%−9%−10%−30%1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−0.3 kn+0%−2%+30%+9%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2022+0.9 kn+21%+29%+12%+53%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2020−0.3 kn−16%−18%+84%−24%Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2024Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.8,75727,27034,0632,02516.82579.59–
2023not published11,93637,19937,7732,51815.031613.8–
2022not published9,17328,97629,0771,89615.331612.6–
2020not published6,75921,30825,9451,79914.42618.27–
2018not published4,38013,65714,11695814.731010.8–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2024Seaspan Ship Management Ltd.9.5917.5−45%420 of 1,974DNVB+C
2023not published13.819.4−29%661 of 1,899DNVB+C
2022not published12.619.1−34%526 of 1,825DNVB+C
2020not published8.2717.6−53%244 of 1,797DNVB+C
2018not published10.820.2−46%314 of 1,705DNVB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.