Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

NESREENA EMPRESS

IMO: 9475727
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 8,166 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.37 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: STRATEGIC ENDEAVOR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MTM SHIP MANAGEMENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED · part of MTM Ship Management

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,166 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

86.6 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

33.36

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+323%)

Average speed

8.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

280 t

CO₂ emitted

881 t

895 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

3,235 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

379 h

16 days, 4% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 86.6 kg/nm · median 82.6 (+5%)

61.0Ranks 2,119 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 8.5 kn · median 10.7 (−21%)

8.8Faster than 8% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.36 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+323%)

4.80Ranks 3,491 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports54%
From the EU33%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU13%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

12.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

NESREENA EMPRESS
Bulk carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

NESREENA EMPRESS
Bulk carrier median

2.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

NESREENA EMPRESS
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	+19%	−2%	−88%	+264%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	−4%	−12%	+359%	−24%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+8.9 kn	−36%	+189%	+3,351%	−49%	8.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 36%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−8.1 kn	+48%	−65%	−97%	+107%	8.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 48%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+5.3 kn	−16%	+70%	−41%	+8%	5.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.4 kn	−8%	−50%	+4%	−35%	4.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	MTM SHIP MANAGEMENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED	280	881	3,235	379	8.5	86.6	33.36	–
2025	ANMA SHIPPING S.A.	280	881	3,235	379	8.5	86.6	33.36	–
2024	MTM SHIP MANAGEMENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED	1,906	5,967	26,310	2,523	10.4	72.5	9.17	95%
2023	not published	431	1,353	5,729	505	11.4	75.2	12.11	98%
2022	not published	19	62	166	65	2.5	116.9	23.62	72%
2021	not published	452	1,428	5,732	541	10.6	78.9	11.39	80%
2019	not published	911	2,858	9,749	1,848	5.3	93.4	10.59	96%
2018	not published	949	2,969	9,366	969	9.7	101.3	16.25	66%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	MTM SHIP MANAGEMENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2025	ANMA SHIPPING S.A.	33.36	7.89	+323%	3,491 of 3,610	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	MTM SHIP MANAGEMENT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED	9.17	8.09	+13%	1,912 of 3,089	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2023	not published	12.11	8.27	+46%	2,789 of 3,548	Lloyd's Register	A
2022	not published	23.62	8.71	+171%	3,813 of 3,968	Lloyd's Register	A+B+C
2021	not published	11.39	8.57	+33%	2,638 of 3,466	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2019	not published	10.59	8.38	+26%	2,402 of 3,360	Lloyd's Register	A+C
2018	not published	16.25	8.50	+91%	3,056 of 3,384	Lloyd's Register	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.