Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

FRONTIER ROSE

IMO: 9487988
Type: Bulk carrier
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EIV 2.82 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD · part of NYK

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 142,833 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

151

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (+66%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

3.30

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (−61%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

40.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,916 t

CO₂ emitted

9,100 t

Distance sailed

19,307 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,721 h

72 days, 20% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 3,548 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 169 kg/nm · median 86.1 (+96%)

63.6Ranks 3,495 of 3,548, lowest first125

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 10.8 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 32% of bulk carrier ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 9.67 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.27 (+17%)

4.85Ranks 2,253 of 3,548, lowest first17.4

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU18%
Into the EU80%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

194 t

2.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

FRONTIER ROSE
Bulk carrier median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

FRONTIER ROSE
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FRONTIER ROSE
Bulk carrier median

2.04.06.08.010.0

’182018’192019’202020’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	−6%	−11%	+72%	–	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+3%	−4%	−75%	+81%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.1 kn	+15%	+5%	+761%	–	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−25%	−21%	−61%	–	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.3 kn	+26%	+29%	−45%	+51%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 26%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−2%	−2%	−41%	−38%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	2,488	7,776	15,630	1,615	9.7	159	–	–
2023	not published	1,530	4,777	9,071	884	10.3	169	9.67	–
2022	not published	5,900	18,422	36,167	3,252	11.1	163	5.34	–
2021	not published	594	1,857	4,201	345	12.2	141	–	–
2020	not published	2,017	6,327	10,638	922	11.5	190	4.97	–
2019	not published	2,916	9,100	19,307	1,721	11.2	151	3.30	–
2018	not published	5,022	15,689	32,556	2,913	11.2	154	5.34	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	9.67	8.27	+17%	2,253 of 3,548	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	5.34	8.71	−39%	476 of 3,968	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	4.97	8.24	−40%	265 of 3,150	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	3.30	8.38	−61%	87 of 3,360	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	5.34	8.50	−37%	457 of 3,384	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.