Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

VINJERAC

IMO: 9489194
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 34,514 t
Flag (estimated): Croatia
Port of registry: Zadar
Technical efficiency: EIV 5.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IB

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Tankerska Plovidba dd

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 27,297 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

114

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (+33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (−18%)

Average speed

10.3 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

28.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,080 t

CO₂ emitted

6,572 t

Distance sailed

18,213 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,771 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 112 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+41%)

52.8Ranks 1,326 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.1 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 45% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−32%)

7.93Ranks 359 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU45%
Into the EU51%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

232 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VINJERAC
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VINJERAC
Chemical tanker median

0.05.010.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VINJERAC
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.1 kn	+5%	+5%	−8%	−34%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.9 kn	+10%	+2%	+88%	−4%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−1%	−1%	+14%	−25%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	−7%	−5%	−46%	+68%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.3 kn	−8%	+4%	+49%	−3%	1.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.5 kn	+1%	+53%	−3%	−43%	3.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+5.5 kn	−9%	+360%	+78%	+45%	5.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Tankerska Plovidba dd	3,235	10,188	28,828	2,637	10.9	112	10.2	80%
2024	Tankerska Plovidba dd	3,322	10,422	31,166	2,839	11.0	107	15.6	–
2023	not published	1,605	5,058	16,617	1,400	11.9	96.6	16.2	–
2022	not published	1,426	4,509	14,613	1,231	11.9	97.6	21.6	–
2021	not published	2,833	8,922	27,060	2,325	11.6	105	12.9	–
2020	not published	2,080	6,572	18,213	1,771	10.3	114	13.2	–
2019	not published	2,125	6,651	18,720	2,768	6.8	114	23.2	–
2018	not published	1,306	4,084	10,494	7,839	1.3	125	16.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Tankerska Plovidba dd	10.2	15.0	−32%	359 of 1,460	Bureau Veritas	C
2024	Tankerska Plovidba dd	15.6	16.7	−7%	587 of 1,274	Bureau Veritas	C
2023	not published	16.2	16.2	−0%	653 of 1,314	Bureau Veritas	C
2022	not published	21.6	16.1	+34%	952 of 1,409	Bureau Veritas	C
2021	not published	12.9	16.7	−23%	398 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	C
2020	not published	13.2	16.2	−18%	422 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	23.2	17.3	+34%	909 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	16.1	17.1	−6%	573 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.