Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

BOW ENDEAVOR

IMO: 9490325
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 16,034 t
Port of registry: Bergen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.81 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: PACIFIC ENDEAVOR

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Thome Croatia d.o.o. · part of OSM Thome

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 16,034 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

70.2 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

13.63

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+71%)

Average speed

13.6 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (+27%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

365 t

CO₂ emitted

1,136 t

1,153 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

5,196 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

382 h

16 days, 4% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 70.2 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−45%)

76.1Ranks 128 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 13.6 kn · median 10.7 (+27%)

8.0Faster than 100% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.63 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+71%)

4.51Ranks 1,255 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU0%
Into the EU100%
At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (568 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BOW ENDEAVOR
Oil tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Average speed, kn

BOW ENDEAVOR
Oil tanker median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BOW ENDEAVOR
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2025	+1.7 kn	+11%	+27%	+14%	+58%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	−11%	−11%	−72%	−31%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	−21%	−25%	−40%	−38%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+24%	+27%	+56%	+86%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.9 kn	−20%	−26%	−30%	−25%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+3%	−1%	+36%	−0%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Thome Croatia d.o.o.	365	1,136	5,196	382	13.6	70.2	13.63	–
2023	not published	289	911	4,575	383	11.9	63.1	8.64	–
2022	not published	1,140	3,609	16,111	1,343	12.0	70.8	12.48	–
2021	not published	2,408	7,634	26,983	2,135	12.6	89.2	20.29	–
2020	not published	1,248	3,944	17,296	1,400	12.4	72.1	10.91	–
2019	not published	2,214	6,948	24,551	1,840	13.3	90.2	14.52	–
2018	not published	1,584	4,987	18,114	1,308	13.9	87.4	14.57	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Thome Croatia d.o.o.	13.63	7.95	+71%	1,255 of 1,665	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	8.64	8.44	+2%	929 of 1,797	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	12.48	16.06	−22%	441 of 1,409	ClassNK	A
2021	not published	20.29	16.69	+22%	855 of 1,343	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	10.91	16.16	−32%	241 of 1,312	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	14.52	17.32	−16%	480 of 1,321	ClassNK	–
2018	not published	14.57	17.14	−15%	484 of 1,294	ClassNK	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.