Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

STENA SHIPPER

IMO: 9503639
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,820 t
Port of registry: Odense
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: GIUSEPPE LUCCHESI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,820 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

111.6 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 104.6 kg/nm (+7%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

125

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 95.19 (+31%)

Average speed

15.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.4 kn (+10%)

Fuel per day at sea

42.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

9,147 t

CO₂ emitted

28,839 t

29,289 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

81,965 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,181 h

216 days, 59% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 111.6 kg/nm · median 104.6 (+7%)

56.6Ranks 134 of 235, lowest first145.3

Average speedThis ship 15.8 kn · median 14.4 (+10%)

10.9Faster than 72% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 124.75 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.19 (+31%)

47.35Ranks 140 of 235, lowest first297.27

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU46%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU3%

52% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (15,024 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.5 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

STENA SHIPPER
Ro-ro median

100.0110.0120.0130.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STENA SHIPPER
Ro-ro median

14.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STENA SHIPPER
Ro-ro median

80.0100120140

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−7%	−3%	+17%	+18%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.1 kn	−1%	+0%	−13%	−9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	−1.2 kn	+0%	−7%	+4%	+17%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.6 kn	−8%	−4%	+5%	−5%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	+18%	+16%	−10%	−0%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.0 kn	−16%	−16%	−16%	+7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−1%	−7%	+24%	−29%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione	196	612	1,423	105	13.5	137.5	220.29	–
2025	Stena Rederi A/S	9,147	28,839	81,965	5,181	15.8	111.6	124.75	–
2024	Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione	8,412	26,234	69,850	4,645	15.0	120.4	105.73	–
2023	not published	9,786	30,533	80,459	5,401	14.9	121.6	116.28	–
2022	not published	9,376	29,248	77,338	4,810	16.1	121.2	99.78	100%
2021	not published	9,642	30,103	73,349	4,718	15.5	131.4	104.67	–
2020	not published	9,062	28,281	81,397	5,139	15.8	111.3	105.14	–
2019	not published	12,753	39,777	96,508	6,109	15.8	132.1	98.56	–
2018	not published	10,337	32,260	77,716	4,584	17.0	133.0	139.12	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione	–	–	–	–	RINA	A
2025	Stena Rederi A/S	124.75	95.19	+31%	140 of 235	DNV	C
2024	Compagnia Italiana Di Navigazione	105.73	97.53	+8%	119 of 220	RINA	A
2023	not published	116.28	108.62	+7%	119 of 221	RINA	A
2022	not published	99.78	90.62	+10%	129 of 223	RINA	A
2021	not published	104.67	103.64	+1%	112 of 219	RINA	A
2020	not published	105.14	102.77	+2%	124 of 238	RINA	A
2019	not published	98.56	90.89	+8%	150 of 271	RINA	A
2018	not published	139.12	91.03	+53%	188 of 260	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.