Navalyze

Navalyze · Gas carrier (LPG) · Ship

GAZ VENTURE

IMO
9506162
Type
Gas carrier
Average cargo carried
2,162 t
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EEXI 13.24 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd · part of Naftomar

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,162 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
67.8 kg/nm
Gas carrier (LPG) median 81.5 kg/nm (−17%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
99.80
g CO₂/t·nm · Gas carrier (LPG) median 35.56 (+181%)
Average speed
9.4 kn
Gas carrier (LPG) median 12.6 kn (−25%)
Fuel per day at sea
15.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,203 t
CO₂ emitted
7,008 t
7,116 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
32,479 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
3,443 h
143 days, 39% of the year

Within the gas carrier (LPG) fleet, 2025

Set against all 355 gas carrier (LPG) ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 67.8 kg/nm · median 81.5 (−17%)
49.8Ranks 84 of 355, lowest first124.4
Average speedThis ship 9.4 kn · median 12.6 (−25%)
8.8Faster than 12% of gas carrier (LPG) ships14.6
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 99.80 g CO₂/t·nm · median 35.56 (+181%)
14.36Ranks 297 of 355, lowest first120.18
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Gas carrier (LPG) medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports15%
  • From the EU39%
  • Into the EU37%
  • At berth in the EU9%

62% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,352 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
9.5%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Gas carrier (LPG) median is the middle ship of all gas carrier (LPG) ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • GAZ VENTURE
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Average speed, kn

  • GAZ VENTURE
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • GAZ VENTURE
  • Gas carrier (LPG) median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025−1.7 kn+12%−4%−24%+84%1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.9 kn−19%−12%+116%−51%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023+0.3 kn−3%+0%+11%−1%Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022−3.1 kn+3%−22%+116%−9%3.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021−2.4 kn−6%−20%+149%+25%2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+10.8 kn−20%+166%+130%−32%10.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−3.5 kn+22%−31%−85%+62%3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 22%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd2,2037,00832,4793,4439.467.899.80–
2024Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd2,5738,04142,6583,84211.160.354.23–
2023not published1,4764,62219,7771,94410.274.6109.98–
2022not published1,3694,28717,8361,8039.976.7111.41–
2021not published6151,9248,24463413.074.6121.80–
2020not published2648243,31721615.479.697.76–
2019not published1444511,4453154.6100.0144.82–
2018not published7862,4549,5751,1778.182.189.43–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmGas carrier (LPG) medianvs Gas carrier (LPG)RankVerifierMethods
2025Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd99.8035.56+181%297 of 355Bureau VeritasA
2024Naftomar Shipping & Trading Co Ltd54.2335.82+51%200 of 306Bureau VeritasA
2023not published109.9841.77+163%280 of 330Bureau VeritasA
2022not published111.4142.53+162%301 of 348Bureau VeritasA
2021not published121.8046.91+160%289 of 323Bureau VeritasA
2020not published97.7642.29+131%273 of 339Bureau VeritasA
2019not published144.8245.85+216%307 of 331Bureau VeritasA
2018not published89.4353.11+68%206 of 297Bureau VeritasA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Gas carrier (LPG) ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's gas carrier (LPG) ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.