Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

PROGRESS

IMO: 9506203
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,721 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.70 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEATRUCK PROGRESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CLdN RoRo Ltd · part of CLdN

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,750 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

118

Ro-ro median 108 kg/nm (+9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

134

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 91.0 (+47%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Ro-ro median 14.7 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

40.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

8,558 t

CO₂ emitted

26,704 t

Distance sailed

72,467 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,140 h

214 days, 59% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 116 kg/nm · median 105 (+11%)

56.6Ranks 146 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 14.1 kn · median 14.4 (−2%)

10.9Faster than 46% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 133 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+39%)

47.4Ranks 147 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports94%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,527 t

5.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PROGRESS
Ro-ro median

100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PROGRESS
Ro-ro median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PROGRESS
Ro-ro median

80.0100120140160

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	−2%	−1%	−56%	+1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+1.8 kn	+11%	+27%	+9%	+2%	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.8 kn	−4%	−17%	−16%	−5%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.5 kn	+2%	+5%	+6%	−11%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−3%	−4%	−5%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−3%	−5%	+5%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−2%	−3%	−4%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	3,440	10,727	29,698	2,108	14.1	116	133	–
2024	CLdN RoRo Ltd	7,984	24,905	67,563	4,823	14.0	118	131	–
2023	not published	6,575	20,512	61,815	5,064	12.2	106	129	–
2022	not published	8,171	25,479	73,378	5,244	14.0	111	136	–
2021	not published	7,567	23,596	69,218	5,115	13.5	109	153	–
2020	not published	8,187	25,549	72,724	5,319	13.7	113	139	–
2019	not published	8,033	25,074	69,222	4,987	13.9	116	136	–
2018	not published	8,558	26,704	72,467	5,140	14.1	118	134	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	133	95.2	+39%	147 of 235	DNV	A+B+C
2024	CLdN RoRo Ltd	131	97.5	+34%	135 of 220	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	129	109	+19%	126 of 221	DNV	A+B+C
2022	not published	136	90.6	+50%	154 of 223	DNV	A+B+C
2021	not published	153	104	+48%	153 of 219	DNV	A+B+C
2020	not published	139	103	+36%	154 of 238	DNV	A+B+C
2019	not published	136	90.9	+50%	190 of 271	DNV	A+B+C
2018	not published	134	91.0	+47%	184 of 260	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.