Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

POWER

IMO: 9506215
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,329 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.66 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEATRUCK POWER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CLdN RoRo Ltd · part of CLdN

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,554 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

107

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (−1%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

130

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 109 (+20%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (−16%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,645 t

CO₂ emitted

20,729 t

Distance sailed

62,226 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,110 h

213 days, 58% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 103 kg/nm · median 105 (−2%)

56.6Ranks 112 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 14.8 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

10.9Faster than 56% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 138 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+45%)

47.4Ranks 153 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

734 t

3.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

POWER
Ro-ro median

100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

POWER
Ro-ro median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

POWER
Ro-ro median

75.0100125150175200

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.6 kn	−12%	−8%	−1%	+3%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.0 kn	+10%	+28%	+15%	+2%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.7 kn	−3%	−15%	−14%	−7%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	+5%	−22%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	−3%	−4%	−2%	+4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	−4%	−6%	−0%	+4%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	−2%	−1%	−5%	+9%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	7,234	22,565	70,423	4,758	14.8	103	138	–
2024	CLdN RoRo Ltd	8,339	26,010	71,263	5,029	14.2	117	134	–
2023	not published	6,645	20,729	62,226	5,110	12.2	107	130	–
2022	not published	8,003	24,957	72,765	5,232	13.9	110	141	–
2021	not published	7,506	23,405	69,434	5,024	13.8	108	180	–
2020	not published	7,899	24,654	70,909	5,075	14.0	111	174	–
2019	not published	8,255	25,763	70,931	4,967	14.3	116	167	–
2018	not published	8,844	27,602	74,765	5,235	14.3	118	154	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	138	95.2	+45%	153 of 235	DNV	A+B+C
2024	CLdN RoRo Ltd	134	97.5	+37%	140 of 220	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	130	109	+20%	130 of 221	DNV	A+B+C
2022	not published	141	90.6	+55%	158 of 223	DNV	A+B+C
2021	not published	180	104	+74%	166 of 219	DNV	A+B+C
2020	not published	174	103	+69%	172 of 238	DNV	A+B+C
2019	not published	167	90.9	+84%	210 of 271	DNV	A+B+C
2018	not published	154	91.0	+69%	199 of 260	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.