Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

PRECISION

IMO: 9506239
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 2,417 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 17.66 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: SEATRUCK PRECISION

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: CLdN RoRo Ltd · part of CLdN

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 2,366 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

107

Ro-ro median 107 kg/nm (+0%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

142

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 109 (+30%)

Average speed

11.8 kn

Ro-ro median 14.6 kn (−19%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,753 t

CO₂ emitted

14,829 t

Distance sailed

44,241 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,758 h

157 days, 43% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2025

Set against all 235 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 108 kg/nm · median 105 (+4%)

56.6Ranks 125 of 235, lowest first145

Average speedThis ship 14.4 kn · median 14.4 (+0%)

10.9Faster than 49% of ro-ro ships17.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 140 g CO₂/t·nm · median 95.2 (+48%)

47.4Ranks 154 of 235, lowest first297

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU49%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

621 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PRECISION
Ro-ro median

100.0105.0110.0115.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRECISION
Ro-ro median

10.012.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRECISION
Ro-ro median

80.0100120140160

’182018’192019’202020’212021’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	−7%	−5%	+20%	−1%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+2.3 kn	+9%	+30%	+59%	+0%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2023	−1.7 kn	−6%	−17%	+1,285%	+0%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	+8%	+3%	−95%	−7%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−1%	+0%	−4%	+0%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2018→2019	−4.5 kn	−6%	−29%	+1%	+69%	4.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	9,134	28,615	84,290	5,843	14.4	108	140	–
2024	CLdN RoRo Ltd	8,260	25,764	70,519	5,002	14.1	117	142	–
2023	not published	4,753	14,829	44,241	3,758	11.8	107	142	–
2021	not published	363	1,133	3,195	237	13.5	114	141	–
2020	not published	6,941	21,668	65,672	4,681	14.0	106	151	–
2019	not published	7,288	22,750	68,222	4,921	13.9	107	151	–
2018	not published	7,696	24,001	67,739	3,676	18.4	114	89.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	CLdN RoRo Ltd	140	95.2	+48%	154 of 235	DNV	A+B+C
2024	CLdN RoRo Ltd	142	97.5	+46%	150 of 220	DNV	A+B+C
2023	not published	142	109	+30%	140 of 221	DNV	A+B+C
2021	not published	141	104	+36%	149 of 219	DNV	A+B+C
2020	not published	151	103	+47%	157 of 238	DNV	A+B+C
2019	not published	151	90.9	+66%	201 of 271	DNV	A+B+C
2018	not published	89.3	91.0	−2%	123 of 260	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.