Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

ARKLOW MOOR

IMO: 9509475
Type: General cargo ship
Average cargo carried: 8,177 t
Flag (estimated): Ireland
Port of registry: Arklow
Technical efficiency: EIV 12.07 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Arklow Shipping ULC · part of Arklow

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,292 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

58.6

General cargo median 55.9 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)

23.1

g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 22.7 (+2%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

General cargo median 10.9 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,526 t

CO₂ emitted

8,022 t

Distance sailed

43,076 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,869 h

161 days, 44% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,723 general cargo ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 62.8 kg/nm · median 35.2 (+78%)

17.4Ranks 2,113 of 2,723, lowest first78.8

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 9.3 (+14%)

6.9Faster than 73% of general cargo ships12.0

CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 24.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 25.5 (−5%)

10.2Ranks 1,231 of 2,723, lowest first52.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports50%
From the EU29%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

439 t

5.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ARKLOW MOOR
General cargo median

30.040.050.060.070.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ARKLOW MOOR
General cargo median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

ARKLOW MOOR
General cargo median

18.020.022.024.026.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.3 kn	+2%	+5%	+3%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	−4%	+3%	+19%	−1%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.9 kn	+17%	−2%	−28%	+40%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	−6%	−4%	−11%	−22%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.5 kn	−2%	+3%	+11%	+3%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.4 kn	−1%	+28%	−5%	+2%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.8 kn	+1%	+12%	+3%	−4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Arklow Shipping ULC	2,128	6,743	33,879	3,210	10.6	62.8	24.3	66%
2024	Arklow Shipping ULC	2,025	6,419	33,022	3,194	10.3	61.3	25.1	–
2023	not published	1,777	5,658	27,727	2,882	9.6	64.1	25.3	–
2022	not published	2,108	6,660	38,419	3,347	11.5	54.9	18.0	–
2021	not published	2,526	8,022	43,076	3,869	11.1	58.6	22.5	–
2020	not published	2,316	7,330	38,945	3,663	10.6	59.5	–	–
2019	not published	2,448	7,689	40,795	4,948	8.2	60.0	22.1	–
2018	not published	2,357	7,441	39,769	5,339	7.4	59.3	23.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nm	General cargo median	vs General cargo	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Arklow Shipping ULC	24.4	25.5	−5%	1,231 of 2,723	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	Arklow Shipping ULC	25.1	19.3	+30%	784 of 1,111	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	25.3	20.7	+22%	703 of 1,045	Bureau Veritas	A
2022	not published	18.0	21.6	−17%	356 of 1,034	Bureau Veritas	A
2021	not published	23.1	22.7	+2%	596 of 1,142	Bureau Veritas	A
2020	not published	22.5	24.5	−8%	485 of 1,167	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	22.1	25.0	−12%	436 of 1,154	Bureau Veritas	A
2018	not published	23.1	24.9	−7%	451 of 1,044	Bureau Veritas	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.