Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

C LEOPARD

IMO: 9542817
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 28,826 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.18 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LAVAUX

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: OCEANA SHIPPING AG

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 26,141 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

81.1

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.69

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (+11%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,398 t

CO₂ emitted

7,488 t

Distance sailed

29,559 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,638 h

110 days, 30% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 77.3 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−9%)

61.8Ranks 1,094 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 10.6 (+11%)

8.8Faster than 90% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.40 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+4%)

4.85Ranks 1,659 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU57%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

124 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

C LEOPARD
Bulk carrier median

75.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

C LEOPARD
Bulk carrier median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

C LEOPARD
Bulk carrier median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	−6%	−8%	+998%	−88%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	+2%	+9%	−94%	+629%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+7%	+2%	+63%	+16%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−5%	−4%	+1%	−4%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+6.7 kn	−9%	+113%	+210%	−18%	6.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.2 kn	+5%	−43%	−70%	+10%	4.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	OCEANA SHIPPING AG	1,549	4,851	20,034	1,698	11.8	77.3	8.40	–
2024	Reefer & General Ship-Mgmt Co	1,549	4,851	20,034	1,698	11.8	77.3	8.40	–
2023	not published	150	471	1,824	152	12.0	82.5	70.7	–
2022	not published	2,398	7,488	29,559	2,638	11.2	81.1	9.69	–
2021	not published	1,367	4,278	18,112	1,530	11.8	75.5	8.34	–
2020	not published	1,432	4,488	17,953	1,546	11.6	79.8	8.69	–
2019	not published	508	1,584	5,789	1,176	4.9	87.8	10.6	–
2018	not published	1,611	5,040	19,316	2,122	9.1	83.4	9.71	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	OCEANA SHIPPING AG	–	–	–	–	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Reefer & General Ship-Mgmt Co	8.40	8.09	+4%	1,659 of 3,089	RINA	A
2023	not published	70.7	8.27	+755%	3,530 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	9.69	8.71	+11%	2,381 of 3,968	RINA	A
2021	not published	8.34	8.57	−3%	1,615 of 3,466	RINA	A
2020	not published	8.69	8.24	+5%	1,745 of 3,150	RINA	A
2019	not published	10.6	8.38	+27%	2,412 of 3,360	RINA	A
2018	not published	9.71	8.50	+14%	2,115 of 3,384	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.