Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

CATTLEYA ACE

IMO: 9544918
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 3,869 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 15.84 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,657 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

110

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

45.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 62.4 (−28%)

Average speed

14.1 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.7 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

37.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,719 t

CO₂ emitted

8,527 t

Distance sailed

24,741 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,760 h

73 days, 20% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 110 kg/nm · median 99.9 (+10%)

79.6Ranks 402 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 14.4 (−8%)

12.0Faster than 27% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 89.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+62%)

34.7Ranks 388 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports38%
From the EU17%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

403 t

4.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CATTLEYA ACE
Vehicle carrier median

60.080.0100.0120.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CATTLEYA ACE
Vehicle carrier median

12.014.016.018.020.0

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CATTLEYA ACE
Vehicle carrier median

20.040.060.080.0100

’182018’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−4.9 kn	−3%	−29%	−31%	–	4.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.0 kn	−0%	+5%	−72%	–	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	+15%	+24%	+27%	+48%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+2.6 kn	+37%	+63%	+223%	−50%	2.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 37%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−19%	−17%	−6%	+134%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2020	−1.0 kn	−18%	−24%	−53%	−13%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	962	3,031	8,751	656	13.3	110	89.5	97%
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	1,447	4,507	12,742	699	18.2	114	–	0%
2023	not published	5,106	16,128	44,755	2,598	17.2	114	67.3	93%
2022	not published	3,500	11,047	35,328	2,210	16.0	99.1	45.6	89%
2021	not published	791	2,496	10,928	815	13.4	72.3	91.6	98%
2020	not published	1,046	3,306	11,674	892	13.1	89.6	39.2	97%
2018	not published	2,719	8,527	24,741	1,760	14.1	110	45.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	89.5	55.4	+62%	388 of 506	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	67.3	56.6	+19%	287 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	45.6	57.7	−21%	105 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	91.6	59.6	+54%	377 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	39.2	57.3	−32%	46 of 449	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	45.0	62.4	−28%	38 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.