Navalyze · Ro-pax · Ship

CONDOR LIBERATION

IMO: 9551363
Type: Ro-pax ship
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.57 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: Condor Marine Services Ltd

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

322

Ro-pax median 158 kg/nm (+103%)

CO₂ per transport work (pax)

2,337

g CO₂/pax·nm · Ro-pax median 729 (+221%)

CO₂ per transport work (freight)

37.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-pax median 184 (−80%)

Average speed

27.3 kn

Ro-pax median 16.1 kn (+70%)

Fuel per day at sea

211.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

13,162 t

CO₂ emitted

42,199 t

Distance sailed

40,845 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,497 h

62 days, 17% of the year

Within the ro-pax fleet, 2024

Set against all 404 ro-pax ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 142 kg/nm · median 151 (−6%)

73.1Ranks 172 of 404, lowest first237

Average speedThis ship 23.8 kn · median 15.7 (+52%)

11.7Faster than 94% of ro-pax ships22.4

CO₂ per transport work (pax)This ship 4,573 g CO₂/pax·nm · median 547 (+737%)

58.4Ranks 382 of 404, lowest first1,957

CO₂ per transport work (freight)This ship 322 g CO₂/t·nm · median 233 (+38%)

30.8Ranks 237 of 404, lowest first1,069

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-pax medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU18%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU63%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

26,442 t

62.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-pax median is the middle ship of all ro-pax ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CONDOR LIBERATION
Ro-pax median

100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

CONDOR LIBERATION
Ro-pax median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (freight), g CO₂/t·nm

CONDOR LIBERATION
Ro-pax median

0.0100200300400

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (pax), g CO₂/pax·nm

CONDOR LIBERATION
Ro-pax median

0.02,0004,0006,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	−4%	−10%	−79%	+241%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.3 kn	+5%	+16%	−28%	−22%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.7 kn	+0%	−3%	+16,669%	−70%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+15.7 kn	−15%	+151%	−99%	+200%	15.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−16.6 kn	+6%	−65%	−67%	+54%	16.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−2.7 kn	−52%	−57%	−1%	−47%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 52%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	Condor Marine Services Ltd	243	778	1,716	72	23.8	142	–	–
2023	not published	1,214	3,891	8,253	326	25.3	147	–	–
2022	not published	1,595	5,115	11,403	496	23.0	140	–	–
2021	not published	10	30	68	3	23.7	139	–	–
2020	not published	2,176	6,975	13,297	1,655	8.0	164	–	–
2019	not published	6,264	20,082	40,581	1,648	24.6	154	–	–
2018	not published	13,162	42,199	40,845	1,497	27.3	322	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/pax·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Rank	Freight, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-pax median	vs Ro-pax	Verifier	Methods
2024	Condor Marine Services Ltd	4,573	547	+737%	382 of 404	322	233	+38%	DNV	B
2023	not published	1,341	680	+97%	327 of 386	112	234	−52%	DNV	B
2022	not published	1,713	626	+174%	361 of 394	140	253	−45%	DNV	B
2021	not published	5,673	815	+596%	373 of 377	316	226	+40%	DNV	B
2020	not published	1,888	751	+151%	323 of 387	119	217	−45%	DNV	B
2019	not published	1,230	569	+116%	320 of 394	18.4	223	−92%	DNV	B
2018	not published	2,337	729	+221%	312 of 361	37.3	184	−80%	DNV	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-pax ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (pax) (TW), in g CO₂/pax·nm, and also per tonne of freight (g CO₂/t·nm freight). CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-pax ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.