Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

PRECIOUS ACE

IMO: 9554200
Type: Vehicle carrier
Average cargo carried: 491 t
Flag (estimated): Japan
Port of registry: Tokyo
Technical efficiency: EEXI 14.90 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,488 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

102

Vehicle carrier median 108 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

92.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 57.7 (+60%)

Average speed

17.0 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.4 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,044 t

CO₂ emitted

6,452 t

Distance sailed

20,000 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,173 h

49 days, 13% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 506 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 82.7 kg/nm · median 99.9 (−17%)

79.6Ranks 62 of 506, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 14.7 kn · median 14.4 (+2%)

12.0Faster than 60% of vehicle carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 524 g CO₂/t·nm · median 55.4 (+846%)

34.7Ranks 498 of 506, lowest first158

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU45%
Into the EU35%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

1,641 t

80% of all fuel; 20% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

167 t

2.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

PRECIOUS ACE
Vehicle carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

PRECIOUS ACE
Vehicle carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

PRECIOUS ACE
Vehicle carrier median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.9 kn	−14%	−23%	+77%	–	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2024	−0.4 kn	−6%	−9%	−56%	–	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+2.7 kn	+15%	+37%	+84%	+116%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.7 kn	−11%	+1%	+72%	−11%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.3 kn	+18%	+14%	−53%	−45%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	−10%	−15%	−36%	−17%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	1,303	4,058	15,760	1,070	14.7	82.7	524	13%
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	850	2,663	8,884	535	16.6	95.7	–	97%
2022	not published	2,044	6,452	20,000	1,173	17.0	102	92.5	80%
2021	not published	963	3,047	10,878	759	14.3	88.6	42.8	98%
2020	not published	631	2,000	6,319	503	12.6	99.9	48.1	95%
2019	not published	1,139	3,565	13,396	1,037	12.9	85.0	86.9	97%
2018	not published	1,969	6,149	20,838	1,526	13.7	94.5	104	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	524	55.4	+846%	498 of 506	ClassNK	C
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	92.5	57.7	+60%	383 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	42.8	59.6	−28%	62 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	48.1	57.3	−16%	130 of 449	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	86.9	59.0	+47%	334 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	104	62.4	+67%	352 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.