Navalyze · Vehicle carrier · Ship

ELEGANT ACE

IMO: 9561265
Type: Vehicle carrier
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 22.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. · part of MOL

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,851 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

88.3

Vehicle carrier median 104 kg/nm (−15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

47.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Vehicle carrier median 59.0 (−20%)

Average speed

12.7 kn

Vehicle carrier median 14.2 kn (−11%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,294 t

CO₂ emitted

10,318 t

Distance sailed

37,313 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,928 h

122 days, 33% of the year

Within the vehicle carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 417 vehicle carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 96.5 kg/nm · median 103 (−6%)

85.2Ranks 124 of 417, lowest first123

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 14.5 (+10%)

12.4Faster than 82% of vehicle carrier ships16.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 62.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 56.6 (+11%)

38.9Ranks 258 of 417, lowest first107

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Vehicle carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports37%
From the EU38%
Into the EU22%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

3,195 t

97% of all fuel; 3% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

320 t

3.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Vehicle carrier median is the middle ship of all vehicle carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ELEGANT ACE
Vehicle carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

ELEGANT ACE
Vehicle carrier median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELEGANT ACE
Vehicle carrier median

25.050.075.0100125150

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+2%	+0%	+299%	–	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.3 kn	+2%	+4%	−46%	+21%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−1.7 kn	−1%	−11%	+85%	−61%	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+3.2 kn	+10%	+35%	−58%	+102%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.5 kn	−1%	+10%	+2%	+39%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−4.3 kn	−15%	−36%	+99%	−16%	4.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	6,413	19,980	65,068	4,153	15.7	98.5	–	55%
2023	not published	1,573	4,964	16,298	1,017	16.0	96.5	62.8	95%
2022	not published	2,843	8,976	29,924	1,911	15.7	95.0	51.9	97%
2021	not published	1,556	4,916	16,192	932	17.4	96.1	133	97%
2020	not published	3,332	10,523	38,212	2,691	14.2	87.2	65.5	63%
2019	not published	3,294	10,318	37,313	2,928	12.7	88.3	47.3	97%
2018	not published	1,955	6,109	18,760	1,105	17.0	104	56.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Vehicle carrier median	vs Vehicle carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	62.8	56.6	+11%	258 of 417	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	51.9	57.7	−10%	180 of 463	ClassNK	C
2021	not published	133	59.6	+123%	423 of 459	ClassNK	C
2020	not published	65.5	57.3	+14%	281 of 449	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	47.3	59.0	−20%	74 of 426	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	56.0	62.4	−10%	145 of 434	ClassNK	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Vehicle carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's vehicle carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.