Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

C TIGER

IMO: 9583706
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 22,015 t
Flag (estimated): Malta
Port of registry: Valletta
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.18 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CHARMEY, MORGES

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: OCEANA SHIPPING AG

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,876 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

82.8

Bulk carrier median 91.4 kg/nm (−9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.57 (+17%)

Average speed

11.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.5 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,641 t

CO₂ emitted

5,144 t

Distance sailed

19,819 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,767 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 3,089 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 76.0 kg/nm · median 84.6 (−10%)

61.8Ranks 1,013 of 3,089, lowest first119

Average speedThis ship 11.2 kn · median 10.6 (+6%)

8.8Faster than 71% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 10.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.09 (+33%)

4.85Ranks 2,289 of 3,089, lowest first15.8

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports3%
From the EU53%
Into the EU40%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

256 t

5.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

C TIGER
Bulk carrier median

75.080.085.090.095.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

C TIGER
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.512.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

C TIGER
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	−5%	−8%	−53%	+13%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−0.4 kn	−3%	−6%	−4%	+12%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−0%	+6%	+36%	−15%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+2%	+1%	−39%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	+352%	+21%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+2%	−7%	−8%	−15%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2024part-year	OCEANA SHIPPING AG	444	1,385	6,249	567	11.0	71.1	12.5	–
2024	Reefer & General Ship-Mgmt Co	931	2,905	12,252	1,098	11.2	76.0	10.8	–
2023	not published	2,075	6,491	25,892	2,258	11.5	80.2	9.56	–
2022	not published	2,232	6,993	27,047	2,274	11.9	82.5	8.57	–
2021	not published	1,641	5,144	19,819	1,767	11.2	82.8	10.0	–
2020	not published	2,628	8,236	32,501	2,868	11.3	80.9	9.58	–
2019	not published	603	1,878	7,190	641	11.2	83.9	7.92	–
2018	not published	646	2,015	7,831	639	12.3	82.5	9.34	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024part-year	OCEANA SHIPPING AG	–	–	–	–	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2024	Reefer & General Ship-Mgmt Co	10.8	8.09	+33%	2,289 of 3,089	RINA	A
2023	not published	9.56	8.27	+16%	2,225 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	8.57	8.71	−2%	1,924 of 3,968	RINA	A
2021	not published	10.0	8.57	+17%	2,270 of 3,466	RINA	A
2020	not published	9.58	8.24	+16%	2,051 of 3,150	RINA	A
2019	not published	7.92	8.38	−5%	1,499 of 3,360	RINA	A
2018	not published	9.34	8.50	+10%	2,000 of 3,384	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.