Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

IRMGARD

IMO: 9590967
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 26,268 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.02 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Blumenthal Asia Pte Ltd

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 25,627 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

93.0

Bulk carrier median 90.8 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

11.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.71 (+31%)

Average speed

8.0 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (−28%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,376 t

CO₂ emitted

4,337 t

Distance sailed

14,795 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,843 h

77 days, 21% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 68.7 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−17%)

61.0Ranks 776 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.3 kn · median 10.7 (−4%)

8.8Faster than 37% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.32 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+5%)

4.80Ranks 1,993 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports24%
From the EU12%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

180 t

4.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

IRMGARD
Bulk carrier median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

IRMGARD
Bulk carrier median

8.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

IRMGARD
Bulk carrier median

7.510.012.515.017.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−20%	−19%	+55%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.6 kn	+16%	+9%	−18%	+11%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.7 kn	−20%	+7%	−11%	−20%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 20%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−4.7 kn	+24%	−22%	−38%	+10%	4.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+2.4 kn	+9%	+35%	+173%	−8%	2.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−10%	−1%	−64%	−22%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.7 kn	−9%	−29%	+150%	−15%	2.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Blumenthal Asia Pte Ltd	1,151	3,662	16,755	1,625	10.3	68.7	8.32	–
2024	Blumenthal Asia Pte Ltd	932	2,936	10,796	1,070	10.1	86.3	10.1	–
2023	not published	981	3,110	13,160	1,233	10.7	74.6	9.11	–
2022	not published	1,376	4,337	14,795	1,843	8.0	93.0	11.4	–
2021	not published	1,798	5,700	23,906	1,879	12.7	75.2	10.4	–
2020	not published	606	1,913	8,769	850	10.3	69.1	11.3	–
2019	not published	1,843	5,781	24,046	2,551	9.4	76.6	14.5	–
2018	not published	812	2,554	9,633	795	12.1	84.3	16.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Blumenthal Asia Pte Ltd	8.32	7.90	+5%	1,993 of 3,611	Verifavia	A
2024	Blumenthal Asia Pte Ltd	10.1	8.09	+25%	2,162 of 3,089	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	9.11	8.27	+10%	2,083 of 3,548	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	11.4	8.71	+31%	2,889 of 3,968	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	10.4	8.57	+21%	2,381 of 3,466	Verifavia	A
2020	not published	11.3	8.24	+37%	2,451 of 3,150	Verifavia	A
2019	not published	14.5	8.38	+72%	2,950 of 3,360	Verifavia	A
2018	not published	16.9	8.50	+99%	3,090 of 3,384	Verifavia	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.